From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 03/10] wireguard: selftests: actually test for routing loops
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:39:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211129153929.3457-4-Jason@zx2c4.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211129153929.3457-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
We previously removed the restriction on looping to self, and then added
a test to make sure the kernel didn't blow up during a routing loop. The
kernel didn't blow up, thankfully, but on certain architectures where
skb fragmentation is easier, such as ppc64, the skbs weren't actually
being discarded after a few rounds through. But the test wasn't catching
this. So actually test explicitly for massive increases in tx to see if
we have a routing loop. Note that the actual loop problem will need to
be addressed in a different commit.
Fixes: b673e24aad36 ("wireguard: socket: remove errant restriction on looping to self")
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh
index ebc4ee0fe179..2e5c1630885e 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh
@@ -276,7 +276,11 @@ n0 ping -W 1 -c 1 192.168.241.2
n1 wg set wg0 peer "$pub2" endpoint 192.168.241.2:7
ip2 link del wg0
ip2 link del wg1
-! n0 ping -W 1 -c 10 -f 192.168.241.2 || false # Should not crash kernel
+read _ _ tx_bytes_before < <(n0 wg show wg1 transfer)
+! n0 ping -W 1 -c 10 -f 192.168.241.2 || false
+sleep 1
+read _ _ tx_bytes_after < <(n0 wg show wg1 transfer)
+(( tx_bytes_after - tx_bytes_before < 70000 ))
ip0 link del wg1
ip1 link del wg0
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-29 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-29 15:39 [PATCH net 00/10] wireguard/siphash patches for 5.16-rc6 Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-11-29 15:39 ` [PATCH net 01/10] wireguard: allowedips: add missing __rcu annotation to satisfy sparse Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-11-29 15:39 ` [PATCH net 02/10] wireguard: selftests: increase default dmesg log size Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-11-29 15:39 ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2021-11-29 15:39 ` [PATCH net 04/10] wireguard: main: rename 'mod_init' & 'mod_exit' functions to be module-specific Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-11-29 15:39 ` [PATCH net 05/10] wireguard: selftests: rename DEBUG_PI_LIST to DEBUG_PLIST Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-11-29 15:39 ` [PATCH net 06/10] wireguard: device: reset peer src endpoint when netns exits Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-11-30 16:00 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-11-29 15:39 ` [PATCH net 07/10] wireguard: receive: use ring buffer for incoming handshakes Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-11-29 15:39 ` [PATCH net 08/10] wireguard: receive: drop handshakes if queue lock is contended Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-11-29 15:39 ` [PATCH net 09/10] wireguard: ratelimiter: use kvcalloc() instead of kvzalloc() Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-11-29 15:39 ` [PATCH net 10/10] siphash: use _unaligned version by default Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-11-29 18:17 ` [PATCH net 00/10] wireguard/siphash patches for 5.16-rc6 Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-29 18:18 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211129153929.3457-4-Jason@zx2c4.com \
--to=jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).