From: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, gustavoars@kernel.org,
haiyangz@microsoft.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kys@microsoft.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
wei.liu@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, shacharr@microsoft.com,
paulros@microsoft.com, olaf@aepfle.de, vkuznets@redhat.com,
Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: mana: Add RX fencing
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:17:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211216001748.8751-1-decui@microsoft.com> (raw)
RX fencing allows the driver to know that any prior change to the RQs has
finished, e.g. when the RQs are disabled/enabled or the hashkey/indirection
table are changed, RX fencing is required.
Remove the previous workaround "ssleep(1)" and add the real support for
RX fencing as the PF driver supports the MANA_FENCE_RQ request now (any
old PF driver not supporting the request won't be used in production).
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana.h | 2 +
drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana.h
index 0c5553887b75..9a12607fb511 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana.h
@@ -289,6 +289,8 @@ struct mana_rxq {
struct mana_cq rx_cq;
+ struct completion fence_event;
+
struct net_device *ndev;
/* Total number of receive buffers to be allocated */
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
index c1d5a374b967..d37d35885579 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
@@ -750,6 +750,61 @@ static int mana_create_eq(struct mana_context *ac)
return err;
}
+static int mana_fence_rq(struct mana_port_context *apc, struct mana_rxq *rxq)
+{
+ struct mana_fence_rq_resp resp = {};
+ struct mana_fence_rq_req req = {};
+ int err;
+
+ init_completion(&rxq->fence_event);
+
+ mana_gd_init_req_hdr(&req.hdr, MANA_FENCE_RQ,
+ sizeof(req), sizeof(resp));
+ req.wq_obj_handle = rxq->rxobj;
+
+ err = mana_send_request(apc->ac, &req, sizeof(req), &resp,
+ sizeof(resp));
+ if (err) {
+ netdev_err(apc->ndev, "Failed to fence RQ %u: %d\n",
+ rxq->rxq_idx, err);
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ err = mana_verify_resp_hdr(&resp.hdr, MANA_FENCE_RQ, sizeof(resp));
+ if (err || resp.hdr.status) {
+ netdev_err(apc->ndev, "Failed to fence RQ %u: %d, 0x%x\n",
+ rxq->rxq_idx, err, resp.hdr.status);
+ if (!err)
+ err = -EPROTO;
+
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&rxq->fence_event, 10 * HZ) == 0) {
+ netdev_err(apc->ndev, "Failed to fence RQ %u: timed out\n",
+ rxq->rxq_idx);
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void mana_fence_rqs(struct mana_port_context *apc)
+{
+ unsigned int rxq_idx;
+ struct mana_rxq *rxq;
+ int err;
+
+ for (rxq_idx = 0; rxq_idx < apc->num_queues; rxq_idx++) {
+ rxq = apc->rxqs[rxq_idx];
+ err = mana_fence_rq(apc, rxq);
+
+ /* In case of any error, use sleep instead. */
+ if (err)
+ msleep(100);
+ }
+}
+
static int mana_move_wq_tail(struct gdma_queue *wq, u32 num_units)
{
u32 used_space_old;
@@ -1023,7 +1078,7 @@ static void mana_process_rx_cqe(struct mana_rxq *rxq, struct mana_cq *cq,
return;
case CQE_RX_OBJECT_FENCE:
- netdev_err(ndev, "RX Fencing is unsupported\n");
+ complete(&rxq->fence_event);
return;
default:
@@ -1617,6 +1672,7 @@ int mana_config_rss(struct mana_port_context *apc, enum TRI_STATE rx,
bool update_hash, bool update_tab)
{
u32 queue_idx;
+ int err;
int i;
if (update_tab) {
@@ -1626,7 +1682,13 @@ int mana_config_rss(struct mana_port_context *apc, enum TRI_STATE rx,
}
}
- return mana_cfg_vport_steering(apc, rx, true, update_hash, update_tab);
+ err = mana_cfg_vport_steering(apc, rx, true, update_hash, update_tab);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ mana_fence_rqs(apc);
+
+ return 0;
}
static int mana_init_port(struct net_device *ndev)
@@ -1773,9 +1835,6 @@ static int mana_dealloc_queues(struct net_device *ndev)
return err;
}
- /* TODO: Implement RX fencing */
- ssleep(1);
-
mana_destroy_vport(apc);
return 0;
--
2.20.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-12-16 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-16 0:17 Dexuan Cui [this message]
2021-12-16 16:44 ` [PATCH net-next] net: mana: Add RX fencing Haiyang Zhang
2021-12-17 4:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211216001748.8751-1-decui@microsoft.com \
--to=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=paulros@microsoft.com \
--cc=shacharr@microsoft.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).