From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42255C433F5 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 08:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239227AbhL2IJ7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 03:09:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35538 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239205AbhL2IJ6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 03:09:58 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99BD6C061574 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:09:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id c9-20020a17090a1d0900b001b2b54bd6c5so2299988pjd.1 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:09:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0JrwVv9QeLCl2D+3Fsm9kJiQZlNCs8/T+NyEIH727dY=; b=CZCW+9Rv5tEtH7If4+bKtzitK4Wi82FXxPxPdlO0i+X0QFDuHuHVAyBvoBO7kGrnC/ M4O3cskPfpiI0qnUXJhb2ffSdhmdeHpE41E8zAiz617cr3asyhq3/bf1uJPUbgOndCXA U3/qiYb9aNUQH4Cu4redyuQDo0wjdd9Oq6pJGs5JojBidi6G9lyunGgMNWc2AyC8z/sV RaCetBrhJs3vAzgkKRlQnk31spiS4d+zNxqqs5MQpWclap7s3VI92KGAnmj0h0fVBL6X Y8z0Trw6IWEhq27tzBSIEq0DRQ+Dc8E0rNbWo8cwMg6GjfU8211C6xoC9LyohCZt2ehJ 8veA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0JrwVv9QeLCl2D+3Fsm9kJiQZlNCs8/T+NyEIH727dY=; b=tAO7RoJGziCwyfvvW1v2KvKWka2dxbBZPvnqzUa9dd6kN1R4PQf2qbppCNf4c3XjNm nOBzo5cQGTWbmZg7E6VGenEqErddB6XDBp3VVFxqLfp+PHPPeuw49cGdEYFNg+HR6UcB ApajCqUIaThf0jycmjIF35CUSREZvhUvP4ENydo7+uQzyTQ3h0TIpsxR3CVBMR2+kTGY AIbvP/ySf6Szums6EnB94FvvpNsePxbXsTUWAeaIbnyY9xzm6diCncq8J7gq8SF/FjnJ z706G67EuRvouKuwwSSe6BQfG0R7fkjjQ2MfoZDnUCtDMAENmZWmbqlisxd5E8FnbrWz 9ZdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531jqdxRrYhMQj+ydfOzCFid2Thikru3B7NBJU4J8ohO2IEN92l1 SVg2dczEc7R6kQyEhr32AYH0o0sLEOo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwqhTMxl+8jnnw+EwmI3Oo8o5beecior426EeIi3QgGaF0nUFm22iu7BNg7xE6QIeK50/Mzag== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e805:b0:148:efe6:ec4a with SMTP id u5-20020a170902e80500b00148efe6ec4amr25547000plg.160.1640765397946; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:09:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from Laptop-X1.redhat.com ([209.132.188.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z2sm23996709pfe.93.2021.12.29.00.09.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:09:57 -0800 (PST) From: Hangbin Liu To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jay Vosburgh , Veaceslav Falico , Andy Gospodarek , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Richard Cochran , Heiner Kallweit , Hangbin Liu Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net_tstamp: define new flag HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 16:09:37 +0800 Message-Id: <20211229080938.231324-2-liuhangbin@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20211229080938.231324-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com> References: <20211229080938.231324-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org As we defined the new hwtstamp_config flag HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX as enum, it's not easy for userspace program to check if the flag is supported when build. Let's define the new flag so user space could build it on old kernel with ifdef check. Fixes: 9c9211a3fc7a ("net_tstamp: add new flag HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX") Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu --- include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h b/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h index e258e52cfd1f..55501e5e7ac8 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ enum hwtstamp_flags { * will be the PHC index. */ HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX = (1<<0), +#define HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX HWTSTAMP_FLAG_LAST = HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX, HWTSTAMP_FLAG_MASK = (HWTSTAMP_FLAG_LAST - 1) | HWTSTAMP_FLAG_LAST -- 2.31.1