From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6A9C433EF for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 14:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236905AbhL2OXY (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 09:23:24 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33470 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233907AbhL2OXX (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 09:23:23 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98808C061574 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 06:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id v11so18917305pfu.2 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 06:23:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=CnNiRTBcajiOHYKIJXEhVed60QQzdoSDVZ2kiH3ve1U=; b=Z8pSt26pSx13FeJpHFouma+1Aq5g1GjKrsMXwkmtKBLFI4I2wO7E3yx+VEv37dJjcs /vla4zZhqy3BF1eBsVF2gPPvNVNs8N2ILfxWPh7to7+bXmHrDbSeMNgj4gIuuL4HtO1x vj9FHWEU092bIon8pg2Sv4do+jK4S2wvCLhOuzLb3f67ZYqRXMw1bxwAUXBhB+xCkGuX KMdPV1qvcOECyMWJ77O9F2xe285LQkQ7P6p+TkBCJYbiPMM95kH+GkS0c+M02LdpRUQn QPihDoH2/hYAWdCwWmmTUEDyr5MLd/Kufvf68SQhfoONUP1wA+GAviEeWbdmv6WjNtJO c86g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=CnNiRTBcajiOHYKIJXEhVed60QQzdoSDVZ2kiH3ve1U=; b=PHEwftPXdiRz3f6PbHhYty+i3bVBrKy7jasI/Owzc7itwowW4GswXuCRJM94l0Yifm CTGoTxi1hRchzC/6JqeKgoN/0kb2ZeohIZ+LehL7cIge+q15gejQ1cWYYunf9ssnp+pQ H7RgCmhzaFh1Ru5sTPaf/ZNlsd5XIQf1xoD8ntYkUCjd1n8G2KVVHAUCJLKIlLUQKANO FzZV9lmgowxB6XJspqwDPq3A/we2lVzZbI/sZpcNmD3KtACyh1maZ842WYLStYrmm1nh Q/H1X9mT9J4r+c2RF7zWdy5cHX4uCPEwNflbYOt/6Imv33G/tDITJNAZwzj79qPNpPh9 Degg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5333ZNdYDgCin4MLjWGVv97YTzBFKbwFYLBt7VWTwxbwrNexw2nx how3MbXuNGvXP4V7lSvFq3I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyarHxCNGbtC6PO8SgpzJ51bqbCvoYgdnhQN2zUZfXNk2Tu6QuTPmk7TrfXqLuFEzkSWa18EQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:3d84:: with SMTP id k126mr22343022pga.410.1640787803112; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 06:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from hoboy.vegasvil.org ([2601:640:8200:33:e2d5:5eff:fea5:802f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u2sm22532708pjc.23.2021.12.29.06.23.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 06:23:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 06:23:19 -0800 From: Richard Cochran To: Hangbin Liu Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh , Veaceslav Falico , Andy Gospodarek , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Heiner Kallweit Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net_tstamp: define new flag HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX Message-ID: <20211229142319.GA4912@hoboy.vegasvil.org> References: <20211229080938.231324-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com> <20211229080938.231324-2-liuhangbin@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211229080938.231324-2-liuhangbin@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 04:09:37PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote: > As we defined the new hwtstamp_config flag HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX > as enum, it's not easy for userspace program to check if the flag is > supported when build. > > Let's define the new flag so user space could build it on old kernel with > ifdef check. > > Fixes: 9c9211a3fc7a ("net_tstamp: add new flag HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX") > Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu Acked-by: Richard Cochran