From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: invert the dependency between bpf-netns.h and netns/bpf.h
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 17:27:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211230012742.770642-3-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211230012742.770642-1-kuba@kernel.org>
netns/bpf.h gets included by netdevice.h (thru net_namespace.h)
which in turn gets included in a lot of places. We should keep
netns/bpf.h as light-weight as possible.
bpf-netns.h seems to contain more implementation details than
deserves to be included in a netns header. It needs to pull in
uapi/bpf.h to get various enum types.
Move enum netns_bpf_attach_type to netns/bpf.h and invert the
dependency. This makes netns/bpf.h fit the mold of a struct
definition header more clearly, and drops the number of objects
rebuilt when uapi/bpf.h is touched from 7.7k to 1.1k.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/bpf-netns.h | 8 +-------
include/net/netns/bpf.h | 9 ++++++++-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-netns.h b/include/linux/bpf-netns.h
index 722f799c1a2e..413cfa5e4b07 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf-netns.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf-netns.h
@@ -3,15 +3,9 @@
#define _BPF_NETNS_H
#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <net/netns/bpf.h>
#include <uapi/linux/bpf.h>
-enum netns_bpf_attach_type {
- NETNS_BPF_INVALID = -1,
- NETNS_BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR = 0,
- NETNS_BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
- MAX_NETNS_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE
-};
-
static inline enum netns_bpf_attach_type
to_netns_bpf_attach_type(enum bpf_attach_type attach_type)
{
diff --git a/include/net/netns/bpf.h b/include/net/netns/bpf.h
index 0ca6a1b87185..2c01a278d1eb 100644
--- a/include/net/netns/bpf.h
+++ b/include/net/netns/bpf.h
@@ -6,11 +6,18 @@
#ifndef __NETNS_BPF_H__
#define __NETNS_BPF_H__
-#include <linux/bpf-netns.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
struct bpf_prog;
struct bpf_prog_array;
+enum netns_bpf_attach_type {
+ NETNS_BPF_INVALID = -1,
+ NETNS_BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR = 0,
+ NETNS_BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+ MAX_NETNS_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE
+};
+
struct netns_bpf {
/* Array of programs to run compiled from progs or links */
struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *run_array[MAX_NETNS_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE];
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-30 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-30 1:27 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] lighten uapi/bpf.h rebuilds Jakub Kicinski
2021-12-30 1:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] net: add includes masked by netdevice.h including uapi/bpf.h Jakub Kicinski
2022-01-06 13:03 ` Wei Liu
2021-12-30 1:27 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2021-12-30 4:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] lighten uapi/bpf.h rebuilds Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211230012742.770642-3-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).