From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F899C433FE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 13:19:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237115AbiAENTg (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2022 08:19:36 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:49104 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240105AbiAENTe (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2022 08:19:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1641388773; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7mMRb17QN6XzgQlrzxtDXtE5EDZ+dGN19op16rmPahE=; b=RMaSahzGIMuObIbLltF1Xl0myVumFN+FlTexaZRtozjGnaiX/uCbijc6dziMswE8DFTIFC m3bw/Tzs1ISsO705oAePQo2LA69wRmmmbvUajg9mZgs832omhtoV9WjFx1eUR2hr31cCnH 76kQGK9mYzWtXHysDiTMNvQ8JRu300I= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-194-NKCg2HE0OziFMiVdMVd3Kw-1; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 08:19:32 -0500 X-MC-Unique: NKCg2HE0OziFMiVdMVd3Kw-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id r2-20020a05600c35c200b00345c3b82b22so1752066wmq.0 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 05:19:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7mMRb17QN6XzgQlrzxtDXtE5EDZ+dGN19op16rmPahE=; b=4ljlNnJDbY/3CyZQ8C2giWWKNh6VDik7TBertMKXnhJ/dctoqLSycfOTzFwImhAF76 5n9mi1JhEc7nLPxR0JRKe2LVaD9fx/DXB2zH19ZKGzRIY5QtfhQYzSuj1s86DxxVvD9q vQzFWxbaIP4je9Uz0z9K9KF5ZzA1+0gRaRGZs9G4IMbcTXt21m4OzS+L6QusPRR5Bm0l RnA6wl3t1+/2/p8AFSzmjVmn9qr3zuaAFApkF+JXnLAQEX1UGaYIKVc+wjqzNxBNovKO GZd0mOYVd2S/ALyKQNQxDX5RjpUnbEVVgTauuZam2c99R6Et7+qbD3KPaBoSVlkxHh1X LMMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HWicUsrOweoGHim+ZWiTo4cdVowYZN8W7jBpxc3Zz3t40NtVm +dSxJK+76t/RCZjBtH7B//bIy+lnmr0yNs3jKfyjBfyluI21XtSE2aFIXCaHKB+j4z/LYD5QETo Hhq+RmBvGatY1cLe7 X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6d8a:: with SMTP id l10mr46890004wrs.527.1641388771551; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 05:19:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQScj6hdnqqFA+e8E8PLZfTEJbd+OlNtelJwRlLiyuB+9CZ+3oM6u8DVU0ok36Nic/ew5TmQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6d8a:: with SMTP id l10mr46889990wrs.527.1641388771377; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 05:19:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from pc-1.home (2a01cb058d24940001d1c23ad2b4ba61.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2a01:cb05:8d24:9400:1d1:c23a:d2b4:ba61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h204sm2670787wmh.33.2022.01.05.05.19.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Jan 2022 05:19:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 14:19:29 +0100 From: Guillaume Nault To: Eric Dumazet Cc: "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , netdev , Eric Dumazet , Paul Mackerras , linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, syzbot Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ppp: ensure minimum packet size in ppp_write() Message-ID: <20220105131929.GA17823@pc-1.home> References: <20220105114842.2380951-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220105114842.2380951-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 03:48:42AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > > It seems pretty clear ppp layer assumed user space > would always be kind to provide enough data > in their write() to a ppp device. > > This patch makes sure user provides at least > 2 bytes. > > It adds PPP_PROTO_LEN macro that could replace > in net-next many occurrences of hard-coded 2 value. The PPP header can be compressed to only 1 byte, but since 2 bytes is assumed in several parts of the code, rejecting such packets in ppp_xmit() is probably the best we can do. Acked-by: Guillaume Nault