netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/7] net: dsa: merge all bools of struct dsa_port into a single u8
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 18:39:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220105183934.yxidfrcwcuirm7au@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d41c058c-d20f-2e9f-ea2c-0a26bdb5fea3@gmail.com>

Hi Florian,

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 10:30:54AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>

Thanks a lot for the review.

I'm a bit on the fence on this patch and the other one for dsa_switch.
The thing is that bit fields are not atomic in C89, so if we update any
of the flags inside dp or ds concurrently (like dp->vlan_filtering),
we're in trouble. Right now this isn't a problem, because most of the
flags are set either during probe, or during ds->ops->setup, or are
serialized by the rtnl_mutex in ways that are there to stay (switchdev
notifiers). That's why I didn't say anything about it. But it may be a
caveat to watch out for in the future. Do you think we need to do
something about it? A lock would not be necessary, strictly speaking.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-05 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-05 13:21 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/7] Cleanup to main DSA structures Vladimir Oltean
2022-01-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/7] net: dsa: move dsa_port :: stp_state near dsa_port :: mac Vladimir Oltean
2022-01-05 18:30   ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/7] net: dsa: merge all bools of struct dsa_port into a single u8 Vladimir Oltean
2022-01-05 18:30   ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-05 18:39     ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2022-01-05 18:46       ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-05 18:56         ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-01-05 19:42           ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-05 22:10       ` Andrew Lunn
2022-01-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 3/7] net: dsa: move dsa_port :: type near dsa_port :: index Vladimir Oltean
2022-01-05 18:31   ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 4/7] net: dsa: merge all bools of struct dsa_switch into a single u32 Vladimir Oltean
2022-01-05 18:32   ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 5/7] net: dsa: make dsa_switch :: num_ports an unsigned int Vladimir Oltean
2022-01-05 18:33   ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 6/7] net: dsa: move dsa_switch_tree :: ports and lags to first cache line Vladimir Oltean
2022-01-05 18:34   ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-05 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 7/7] net: dsa: combine two holes in struct dsa_switch_tree Vladimir Oltean
2022-01-05 18:34   ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-05 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/7] Cleanup to main DSA structures Vladimir Oltean
2022-01-05 18:37   ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-05 18:39 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-05 18:59   ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-01-05 19:04     ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-05 19:22       ` Vladimir Oltean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220105183934.yxidfrcwcuirm7au@skbuf \
    --to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).