From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27F2C433FE for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 12:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241229AbiBEMKd (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2022 07:10:33 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:37205 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232479AbiBEMKc (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2022 07:10:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1644063032; x=1675599032; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=lZP4CupIkHIl8x9BJu41rQxOUyIclXltfTO1C9bu780=; b=RpS4nsTiEJVsRadApBDTxJxCnHyICwYpWc+itamsTmE9yGwoP2uplyl2 0GBQqq/fFm350uPhy9oYh/oHfhJAp6QyeTBnZvlApbKBDqsdvbBdYZrgB /8dJsoXT4gGBdomRfINmG+mvX4ovA6lMlj8pX8KSnYg+7WP/ri2pZt5fz gtJ4uhjZU269xhdEsYAXnWHkrNTrhiOzWvl4VlLlpbobha8cegxvE5TUN 9HGzZUYZg/EC5vyLB8YaLZzLMD56Z5ZUCxG2TGNw+Igl0p1Ye/9eY/HMd qsg7wAXffWM3p8+Cxd23UE5vUVald9XfwepK1ktuTS8iJaMj5rRdQEd6j Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10248"; a="247340766" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,345,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="247340766" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2022 04:10:31 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,345,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="584391910" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 276f1b88eecb) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2022 04:10:30 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 276f1b88eecb with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nGJtd-000Z0M-H9; Sat, 05 Feb 2022 12:10:29 +0000 Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2022 20:09:48 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: "D. Wythe" , kgraul@linux.ibm.com Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, "D. Wythe" Subject: [RFC PATCH] net/smc: smc_tcp_ls_wq can be static Message-ID: <20220205120947.GA10751@d01e203e4d07> References: <1d7365b47719546fe1f145affb01398d8287b381.1644041638.git.alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1d7365b47719546fe1f145affb01398d8287b381.1644041638.git.alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org net/smc/af_smc.c:62:25: warning: symbol 'smc_tcp_ls_wq' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: kernel test robot --- af_smc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c index 05b88cbadf3d1..4969ac8029a98 100644 --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(smc_client_lgr_pending); /* serialize link group * creation on client */ -struct workqueue_struct *smc_tcp_ls_wq; /* wq for tcp listen work */ +static struct workqueue_struct *smc_tcp_ls_wq; /* wq for tcp listen work */ struct workqueue_struct *smc_hs_wq; /* wq for handshake work */ struct workqueue_struct *smc_close_wq; /* wq for close work */