From: "dust.li" <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Stefan Raspl <raspl@linux.ibm.com>,
Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>,
Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>,
kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/smc: Add autocork support
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 15:33:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220218073327.GB5443@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yg6Q2kIDJrhvNVz7@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 07:15:54PM +0100, Hendrik Brueckner wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 09:22:00PM +0800, dust.li wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:37:28AM +0100, Stefan Raspl wrote:
>> >On 2/16/22 16:27, dust.li wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 02:58:32PM +0100, Stefan Raspl wrote:
>> >> > On 2/16/22 04:49, Dust Li wrote:
>> >> >
>>
>> >Now we understand that cloud workloads are a bit different, and the desire to
>> >be able to modify the environment of a container while leaving the container
>> >image unmodified is understandable. But then again, enabling the base image
>> >would be the cloud way to address this. The question to us is: How do other
>> >parts of the kernel address this?
>>
>> I'm not familiar with K8S, but from one of my colleague who has worked
>> in that area tells me for resources like CPU/MEM and configurations
>> like sysctl, can be set using K8S configuration:
>> https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/sysctl-cluster/
>
>For K8s, this involves container engines like cri-o, containerd, podman,
>and others towards the runtimes like runc. To ensure they operate together,
>specifications by the Open Container Initiative (OCI) at
>https://opencontainers.org/release-notices/overview/
>
>For container/pod deployments, there is especially the Container Runtime
>Interface (CRI) that defines the interface, e.g., of K8s to cri-o etc.
>
>CRI includes support for (namespaced) sysctl's:
>https://github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec/releases/tag/v1.0.2
>
>In essence, the CRI spec would allow users to specify/control a specific
>runtime for the container in a declarative way w/o modifying the (base)
>container images.
Thanks a lot for your kind explanation !
After a quick look at the OCI spec, I saw the support for file based
configuration (Including sysfs/procfs etc.). And unfortunately, no
netlink support.
Hi Karsten & Stefan:
Back to the patch itself, do you think I need to add the control switch
now ? Or just leave the switch and fix other issues first ?
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-18 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-16 3:49 [PATCH] net/smc: Add autocork support Dust Li
2022-02-16 3:53 ` dust.li
2022-02-16 10:32 ` Karsten Graul
2022-02-16 10:55 ` dust.li
2022-02-16 13:58 ` Stefan Raspl
2022-02-16 15:27 ` dust.li
2022-02-17 9:37 ` Stefan Raspl
2022-02-17 13:22 ` dust.li
2022-02-17 18:15 ` Hendrik Brueckner
2022-02-18 7:33 ` dust.li [this message]
2022-02-18 16:03 ` Karsten Graul
2022-02-18 23:42 ` dust.li
2022-02-23 18:57 ` Karsten Graul
2022-02-24 2:02 ` dust.li
2022-02-25 18:10 ` Karsten Graul
2022-02-25 23:42 ` dust.li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220218073327.GB5443@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brueckner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raspl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).