From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A182C433FE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 02:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232613AbiB1Cdd (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Feb 2022 21:33:33 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54770 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231653AbiB1Cda (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Feb 2022 21:33:30 -0500 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc (Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:520::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7386F37A33; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 18:32:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw by Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nOVqA-0007Ks-EM; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 03:32:46 +0100 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 03:32:46 +0100 From: Florian Westphal To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 18/32] netfilter: egress: avoid a lockdep splat Message-ID: <20220228023246.GA26547@breakpoint.cc> References: <20220109231640.104123-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <20220109231640.104123-19-pablo@netfilter.org> <872e2596-4d7c-3b91-341c-0db3a3d7fd57@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <872e2596-4d7c-3b91-341c-0db3a3d7fd57@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Eric Dumazet wrote: > > index b71b57a83bb4..b4dd96e4dc8d 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/netfilter_netdev.h > > +++ b/include/linux/netfilter_netdev.h > > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *nf_hook_egress(struct sk_buff *skb, int *rc, > > return skb; > > #endif > > - e = rcu_dereference(dev->nf_hooks_egress); > > + e = rcu_dereference_check(dev->nf_hooks_egress, rcu_read_lock_bh_held()); > > if (!e) > > return skb; > > > It seems other rcu_dereference() uses will also trigger lockdep splat. > if (genbit) >     blob = rcu_dereference(chain->blob_gen_1); > else >    blob = rcu_dereference(chain->blob_gen_0); > > I wonder how many other places will need a fix ? I don't like that, all nf hooks assume rcu_read_lock is held. nf_hook_egress() call to nf_hook_slow() needs to be wrapped in rcu_read_(un)lock pair.