From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33974C433F5 for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 19:22:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234027AbiCFTXj (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Mar 2022 14:23:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45072 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233281AbiCFTXh (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Mar 2022 14:23:37 -0500 Received: from v-zimmta03.u-bordeaux.fr (v-zimmta03.u-bordeaux.fr [147.210.215.83]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61F012899F; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 11:22:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from v-zimmta03.u-bordeaux.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by v-zimmta03.u-bordeaux.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C04B1800F22; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 20:22:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from begin (lfbn-bor-1-255-114.w90-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.50.98.114]) by v-zimmta03.u-bordeaux.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E09751800F20; Sun, 6 Mar 2022 20:22:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from samy by begin with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1nQwSk-0010iI-DQ; Sun, 06 Mar 2022 20:22:38 +0100 Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2022 20:22:38 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault To: Willem de Bruijn Cc: willemb@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Network Development Subject: Re: [PATCH] SO_ZEROCOPY should rather return -ENOPROTOOPT Message-ID: <20220306192238.fbvp2t32fsemqssf@begin> Mail-Followup-To: Samuel Thibault , Willem de Bruijn , willemb@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Network Development References: <20220301144453.snstwdjy3kmpi4zf@begin> <20220301150028.romzjw2b4aczl7kf@begin> <20220301152017.jkx7amcbfqkoojin@begin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: I am not organized User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hello, Willem de Bruijn, le mar. 01 mars 2022 10:21:41 -0500, a ecrit: > > > > > > @@ -1377,9 +1377,9 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, > > > > > > if (!(sk_is_tcp(sk) || > > > > > > (sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM && > > > > > > sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_UDP))) > > > > > > - ret = -ENOTSUPP; > > > > > > + ret = -ENOPROTOOPT; > > > > > > } else if (sk->sk_family != PF_RDS) { > > > > > > - ret = -ENOTSUPP; > > > > > > + ret = -ENOPROTOOPT; > > > > > > } > > > > > > if (!ret) { > > > > > > if (val < 0 || val > 1) > > > > > > > > > > That should have been a public error code. Perhaps rather EOPNOTSUPP. > > > > > > > > > > The problem with a change now is that it will confuse existing > > > > > applications that check for -524 (ENOTSUPP). > > > > > > > > They were not supposed to hardcord -524... > > > > > > > > Actually, they already had to check against EOPNOTSUPP to support older > > > > kernels, so EOPNOTSUPP is not supposed to pose a problem. > > > > > > Which older kernels returned EOPNOTSUPP on SO_ZEROCOPY? > > > > Sorry, bad copy/paste, I meant ENOPROTOOPT. > > Same point though, right? These are not legacy concerns, but specific > to applications written to SO_ZEROCOPY. > > I expect that most will just ignore the exact error code and will work > with either. Ok, so, is this an Acked-by: you? :) Samuel