From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Regression in add xfrm interface
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 12:11:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220307121123.1486c035@hermes.local> (raw)
There appears to be a regression between 5.10 (Debian 11) and 5.16 (Debian testing)
kernel in handling of ip link xfrm create. This shows up in the iproute2 testsuite
which now fails. This is kernel (not iproute2) regression.
Running ip/link/add_type_xfrm.t [iproute2-this/5.16.0-1-amd64]: FAILED
Good log:
::::::::::::::
link/add_type_xfrm.t.iproute2-this.out
::::::::::::::
[Testing Add XFRM Interface, With IF-ID]
tests/ip/link/add_type_xfrm.t: Add dev-ktyXSm xfrm interface succeeded
tests/ip/link/add_type_xfrm.t: Show dev-ktyXSm xfrm interface succeeded with output:
2: dev-ktyXSm@lo: <NOARP,M-DOWN> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/none promiscuity 0 minmtu 68 maxmtu 65535
xfrm if_id 0xf addrgenmode eui64 numtxqueues 1 numrxqueues 1 gso_max_size 65536 gso_max_segs 65535
test on: "dev-ktyXSm" [SUCCESS]
test on: "if_id 0xf" [SUCCESS]
tests/ip/link/add_type_xfrm.t: Del dev-ktyXSm xfrm interface succeeded
[Testing Add XFRM Interface, No IF-ID]
tests/ip/link/add_type_xfrm.t: Add dev-tkUDaA xfrm interface succeeded
tests/ip/link/add_type_xfrm.t: Show dev-tkUDaA xfrm interface succeeded with output:
3: dev-tkUDaA@lo: <NOARP,M-DOWN> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/none promiscuity 0 minmtu 68 maxmtu 65535
xfrm if_id 0 addrgenmode eui64 numtxqueues 1 numrxqueues 1 gso_max_size 65536 gso_max_segs 65535
test on: "dev-tkUDaA" [SUCCESS]
test on: "if_id 0xf" [SUCCESS]
tests/ip/link/add_type_xfrm.t: Del dev-tkUDaA xfrm interface succeeded
Failed log:
[Testing Add XFRM Interface, With IF-ID]
tests/ip/link/add_type_xfrm.t: Add dev-pxNsUc xfrm interface succeeded
tests/ip/link/add_type_xfrm.t: Show dev-pxNsUc xfrm interface succeeded with output:
2: dev-pxNsUc@lo: <NOARP,M-DOWN> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/none promiscuity 0 minmtu 68 maxmtu 65535
xfrm if_id 0xf addrgenmode eui64 numtxqueues 1 numrxqueues 1 gso_max_size 65536 gso_max_segs 65535
test on: "dev-pxNsUc" [SUCCESS]
test on: "if_id 0xf" [SUCCESS]
tests/ip/link/add_type_xfrm.t: Del dev-pxNsUc xfrm interface succeeded
[Testing Add XFRM Interface, No IF-ID]
test on: "dev-dSwSKP" [FAILED]
test on: "if_id 0xf" [FAILED]
next reply other threads:[~2022-03-07 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-07 20:11 Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2022-03-08 7:50 ` Regression in add xfrm interface Steffen Klassert
2022-03-08 13:51 ` Antony Antony
2022-03-08 16:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-03-09 7:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220307121123.1486c035@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).