netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@engleder-embedded.com>
Cc: yangbo.lu@nxp.com, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	mlichvar@redhat.com,
	Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] ptp: Support hardware clocks with additional free running time
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 06:34:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220307143440.GC29247@hoboy.vegasvil.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220306215032.GA10311@hoboy.vegasvil.org>

On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 01:50:32PM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 07:38:55PM +0100, Gerhard Engleder wrote:
> > How can I cover my use case with the existing API? I had no idea so far.
> 
> Okay, so 2 PHCs doesn't help, but still all you need is:
> 
> 1. a different method to convert time stamps to vclock time base
> 
> 2. a different method for vclocks' gettime
> 
> So let me suggest a much smaller change to the phc/vclock api... stay tuned

For #1:

On the receive path, the stack calls ptp_convert_timestamp() if the
socket has the SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE option.  In that method,
you need only get the raw cycle count if supported by the pclock.

So instead of:

	vclock = info_to_vclock(ptp->info);

	ns = ktime_to_ns(hwtstamps->hwtstamp);

	spin_lock_irqsave(&vclock->lock, flags);
	ns = timecounter_cyc2time(&vclock->tc, ns);
	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vclock->lock, flags);

something like this:

	vclock = info_to_vclock(ptp->info);

	cycles = pclock->ktime_to_cycles(hwtstamps->hwtstamp);

	spin_lock_irqsave(&vclock->lock, flags);
	ns = timecounter_cyc2time(&vclock->tc, cycles);
	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vclock->lock, flags);

This new class method, ktime_to_cycles, can simply do ktime_to_ns() by
default for all of the existing drivers, but your special driver can
look up the hwtstamp in a cache of {hwtstamp, cycles} pairs.

(No need to bloat skbuff by another eight bytes!)

For #2:

Similarly, add a new class method, say, pclock.get_cycles that does

	if (ptp->info->gettimex64)
		ptp->info->gettimex64(ptp->info, &ts, NULL);
	else
		ptp->info->gettime64(ptp->info, &ts);

by default, but in your driver will read the special counter.

Thanks,
Richard

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-07 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-06  8:56 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] ptp: Support hardware clocks with additional free running time Gerhard Engleder
2022-03-06  8:56 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/6] bpf: Access hwtstamp field of hwtstamps directly Gerhard Engleder
2022-03-06  8:56 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] ptp: Initialize skb_shared_hwtstamps Gerhard Engleder
2022-03-06  8:56 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/6] ptp: Add free running time support Gerhard Engleder
2022-03-06 16:36   ` Richard Cochran
2022-03-06  8:56 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/6] ptp: Support time stamps based on free running time Gerhard Engleder
2022-03-06 16:42   ` Richard Cochran
2022-03-06  8:56 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/6] ptp: Allow vclocks without free running physical clock Gerhard Engleder
2022-03-06  8:56 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 6/6] tsnep: Add free running time support Gerhard Engleder
2022-03-06 16:49 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] ptp: Support hardware clocks with additional free running time Richard Cochran
2022-03-06 16:53   ` Richard Cochran
2022-03-06 17:05 ` Richard Cochran
2022-03-06 18:38   ` Gerhard Engleder
2022-03-06 21:50     ` Richard Cochran
2022-03-07 14:34       ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2022-03-07 17:54         ` Gerhard Engleder
2022-03-07 21:30           ` Richard Cochran
2022-03-08  0:55           ` Richard Cochran
2022-03-08 19:49             ` Gerhard Engleder
2022-03-08 20:52               ` Richard Cochran
2022-03-08  0:57           ` Richard Cochran
2022-03-07 12:07 ` Michael Walle
2022-03-07 14:05   ` Richard Cochran
2022-03-07 14:23     ` Miroslav Lichvar
2022-03-07 14:37       ` Richard Cochran
2022-03-08 20:55         ` Richard Cochran
2022-03-07 16:01   ` Gerhard Engleder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220307143440.GC29247@hoboy.vegasvil.org \
    --to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gerhard@engleder-embedded.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
    --cc=yangbo.lu@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).