netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 12/12] fprobe: Add a selftest for fprobe
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 09:17:45 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220310091745.73580bd6314803cfbf21312d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <164673784786.1984170.244480726272055433.stgit@devnote2>

Hi,

On Tue,  8 Mar 2022 20:10:48 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> Add a KUnit based selftest for fprobe interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> ---
>  Changes in v9:
>   - Rename fprobe_target* to fprobe_selftest_target*.
>   - Find the correct expected ip by ftrace_location_range().
>   - Since the ftrace_location_range() is not exposed to module, make
>     this test only for embedded.
>   - Add entry only test.
>   - Reset the fprobe structure before reuse it.
> ---
>  lib/Kconfig.debug |   12 ++++
>  lib/Makefile      |    2 +
>  lib/test_fprobe.c |  174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 188 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 lib/test_fprobe.c
> 
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 14b89aa37c5c..ffc469a12afc 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -2100,6 +2100,18 @@ config KPROBES_SANITY_TEST
>  
>  	  Say N if you are unsure.
>  
> +config FPROBE_SANITY_TEST
> +	bool "Self test for fprobe"
> +	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> +	depends on FPROBE
> +	depends on KUNIT

Hmm, this caused a build error with allmodconfig because KUNIT=m but FPROBE_SANITY_TEST=y.
Let me fix this issue.

Thank you,

> +	help
> +	  This option will enable testing the fprobe when the system boot.
> +	  A series of tests are made to verify that the fprobe is functioning
> +	  properly.
> +
> +	  Say N if you are unsure.
> +
>  config BACKTRACE_SELF_TEST
>  	tristate "Self test for the backtrace code"
>  	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
> index 300f569c626b..154008764b16 100644
> --- a/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/Makefile
> @@ -103,6 +103,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_HMM) += test_hmm.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_FREE_PAGES) += test_free_pages.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_REF_TRACKER) += test_ref_tracker.o
> +CFLAGS_test_fprobe.o += $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> +obj-$(CONFIG_FPROBE_SANITY_TEST) += test_fprobe.o
>  #
>  # CFLAGS for compiling floating point code inside the kernel. x86/Makefile turns
>  # off the generation of FPU/SSE* instructions for kernel proper but FPU_FLAGS
> diff --git a/lib/test_fprobe.c b/lib/test_fprobe.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ed70637a2ffa
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/test_fprobe.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * test_fprobe.c - simple sanity test for fprobe
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/fprobe.h>
> +#include <linux/random.h>
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
> +#define div_factor 3
> +
> +static struct kunit *current_test;
> +
> +static u32 rand1, entry_val, exit_val;
> +
> +/* Use indirect calls to avoid inlining the target functions */
> +static u32 (*target)(u32 value);
> +static u32 (*target2)(u32 value);
> +static unsigned long target_ip;
> +static unsigned long target2_ip;
> +
> +static noinline u32 fprobe_selftest_target(u32 value)
> +{
> +	return (value / div_factor);
> +}
> +
> +static noinline u32 fprobe_selftest_target2(u32 value)
> +{
> +	return (value / div_factor) + 1;
> +}
> +
> +static notrace void fp_entry_handler(struct fprobe *fp, unsigned long ip, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(current_test, preemptible());
> +	/* This can be called on the fprobe_selftest_target and the fprobe_selftest_target2 */
> +	if (ip != target_ip)
> +		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(current_test, ip, target2_ip);
> +	entry_val = (rand1 / div_factor);
> +}
> +
> +static notrace void fp_exit_handler(struct fprobe *fp, unsigned long ip, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	unsigned long ret = regs_return_value(regs);
> +
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(current_test, preemptible());
> +	if (ip != target_ip) {
> +		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(current_test, ip, target2_ip);
> +		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(current_test, ret, (rand1 / div_factor) + 1);
> +	} else
> +		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(current_test, ret, (rand1 / div_factor));
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(current_test, entry_val, (rand1 / div_factor));
> +	exit_val = entry_val + div_factor;
> +}
> +
> +/* Test entry only (no rethook) */
> +static void test_fprobe_entry(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct fprobe fp_entry = {
> +		.entry_handler = fp_entry_handler,
> +	};
> +
> +	current_test = test;
> +
> +	/* Before register, unregister should be failed. */
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, unregister_fprobe(&fp_entry));
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, register_fprobe(&fp_entry, "fprobe_selftest_target*", NULL));
> +
> +	entry_val = 0;
> +	exit_val = 0;
> +	target(rand1);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, entry_val);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, exit_val);
> +
> +	entry_val = 0;
> +	exit_val = 0;
> +	target2(rand1);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, entry_val);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, exit_val);
> +
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, unregister_fprobe(&fp_entry));
> +}
> +
> +static void test_fprobe(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct fprobe fp = {
> +		.entry_handler = fp_entry_handler,
> +		.exit_handler = fp_exit_handler,
> +	};
> +
> +	current_test = test;
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, register_fprobe(&fp, "fprobe_selftest_target*", NULL));
> +
> +	entry_val = 0;
> +	exit_val = 0;
> +	target(rand1);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, entry_val);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entry_val + div_factor, exit_val);
> +
> +	entry_val = 0;
> +	exit_val = 0;
> +	target2(rand1);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, entry_val);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entry_val + div_factor, exit_val);
> +
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, unregister_fprobe(&fp));
> +}
> +
> +static void test_fprobe_syms(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	static const char *syms[] = {"fprobe_selftest_target", "fprobe_selftest_target2"};
> +	struct fprobe fp = {
> +		.entry_handler = fp_entry_handler,
> +		.exit_handler = fp_exit_handler,
> +	};
> +
> +	current_test = test;
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, register_fprobe_syms(&fp, syms, 2));
> +
> +	entry_val = 0;
> +	exit_val = 0;
> +	target(rand1);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, entry_val);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entry_val + div_factor, exit_val);
> +
> +	entry_val = 0;
> +	exit_val = 0;
> +	target2(rand1);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, entry_val);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entry_val + div_factor, exit_val);
> +
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, unregister_fprobe(&fp));
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long get_ftrace_location(void *func)
> +{
> +	unsigned long size, addr = (unsigned long)func;
> +
> +	if (!kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(addr, &size, NULL) || !size)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return ftrace_location_range(addr, addr + size - 1);
> +}
> +
> +static int fprobe_test_init(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	do {
> +		rand1 = prandom_u32();
> +	} while (rand1 <= div_factor);
> +
> +	target = fprobe_selftest_target;
> +	target2 = fprobe_selftest_target2;
> +	target_ip = get_ftrace_location(target);
> +	target2_ip = get_ftrace_location(target2);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case fprobe_testcases[] = {
> +	KUNIT_CASE(test_fprobe_entry),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(test_fprobe),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(test_fprobe_syms),
> +	{}
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite fprobe_test_suite = {
> +	.name = "fprobe_test",
> +	.init = fprobe_test_init,
> +	.test_cases = fprobe_testcases,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suites(&fprobe_test_suite);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-10  0:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-08 11:08 [PATCH v10 00/12] fprobe: Introduce fprobe function entry/exit probe Masami Hiramatsu
2022-03-08 11:08 ` [PATCH v10 01/12] ftrace: Add ftrace_set_filter_ips function Masami Hiramatsu
2022-03-08 11:08 ` [PATCH v10 02/12] fprobe: Add ftrace based probe APIs Masami Hiramatsu
2022-03-08 11:09 ` [PATCH v10 03/12] rethook: Add a generic return hook Masami Hiramatsu
2022-03-11  3:52   ` Hou Tao
2022-03-08 11:09 ` [PATCH v10 04/12] rethook: x86: Add rethook x86 implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2022-03-08 11:09 ` [PATCH v10 05/12] arm64: rethook: Add arm64 rethook implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2022-03-08 11:09 ` [PATCH v10 06/12] powerpc: Add rethook support Masami Hiramatsu
2022-03-08 11:09 ` [PATCH v10 07/12] ARM: rethook: Add rethook arm implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2022-03-08 11:10 ` [PATCH v10 08/12] fprobe: Add exit_handler support Masami Hiramatsu
2022-03-08 11:10 ` [PATCH v10 09/12] fprobe: Add sample program for fprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2022-03-08 11:10 ` [PATCH v10 10/12] fprobe: Introduce FPROBE_FL_KPROBE_SHARED flag " Masami Hiramatsu
2022-03-08 11:10 ` [PATCH v10 11/12] docs: fprobe: Add fprobe description to ftrace-use.rst Masami Hiramatsu
2022-03-08 11:10 ` [PATCH v10 12/12] fprobe: Add a selftest for fprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2022-03-10  0:17   ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2022-03-10  0:40     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-03-10 15:11       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-03-11 18:35         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-03-12  1:57           ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220310091745.73580bd6314803cfbf21312d@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).