From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B1EC433EF for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344011AbiCJPLN (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:11:13 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36852 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344074AbiCJPLF (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:11:05 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A30381959FC; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 07:05:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id C0F4268AFE; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 16:05:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 16:05:06 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Mingbao Sun Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Eric Dumazet , "David S . Miller" , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , David Ahern , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tyler.sun@dell.com, ping.gan@dell.com, yanxiu.cai@dell.com, libin.zhang@dell.com, ao.sun@dell.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: export symbol tcp_set_congestion_control Message-ID: <20220310150506.GA1939@lst.de> References: <20220310134830.130818-1-sunmingbao@tom.com> <20220310141135.GA750@lst.de> <20220310230300.00004612@tom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220310230300.00004612@tom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:03:00PM +0800, Mingbao Sun wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:11:35 +0100 > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Please submit this together with the actual user(s) in a series. > > Patches to just export random symbols are a no-go. > > Got it. > many thanks for informing. > > BTW: > could you give me the answer to the following questions? > 1. Against which repo should I prepare and test this series of patches? > netdev or nvme? I think for the initial RFC either is fine, just clearly state which. > 2. what's the recipients for this series of patches? > netdev or nvme or both? both.