From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044A3C433EF for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 13:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1355987AbiCPNET (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:04:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44946 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1355929AbiCPNER (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:04:17 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE9CA55B9; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 06:03:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id b24so2601820edu.10; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 06:03:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=8ZZlmqC5VFB+TpGNzx3hi7Wlj0HQtNbpALYNMUhypww=; b=nIgBjOLQD1J7QK6kKh4kQuZuvR0bB1+otQ7TZDdrnqTfUYfWIMdVfMIcC+ia9FYnEl fUD5UAEae9GmQjkitTfcBXsqeF8XkckgfF+k6esCH2FqSv1QhiY94QJLTI/ajXmcVzbN 9s2oGAgYu5IJ7CkD265nYF8+WiusP4qqMH9zZYLg0v+kbIYPKHtaGXuZsO9BImtR16CZ HZn3hc6vsGf0z8GuqmhW/7UAE/bxoN5KGlod0MLxnIcXQhp/0wdJMn0S9loIjGUuZTqF l06zo9FUxvqHhLSN3Suk3R58+sRQL1zxvKN4VIZlPQ/HM4zrIiSaR8tuk+4/f6P8ORej YvZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=8ZZlmqC5VFB+TpGNzx3hi7Wlj0HQtNbpALYNMUhypww=; b=Ae4njeb2Shdber+YF3O7X2CHjKbRVASdFw0YPisr2kjHIjRMx14pIeg5LqwfDgSPJE +D6BAKAZSVt7Tc8f3vvl6D/FKXs15ivatKx15nB5jieqyEeEce9PBBhI7zL0PrDfRZK9 MByprsyIYDdkV5+i2MS0gTCjQISYuI/fvOaxdW8V+tyLGD0htRvRGxYSdT541KtGJm+K 3FrOezKh588tKcgbqxrWD5ScmmlgmMkGQDqZKtI2clu437woNGPqSQnxTlhZ9kHjmVdg tPlFIQLr3BdcFJoe02DwGCL38DbG0nsZXaXTUcKPBKSVmkRRkW6s+1dqUqO11PE2adGm msBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5321uHFL5UfpJpJjfX975EzSmxIqHxCRzClLL1gvNSVlLEtpIRyn pwquDPnll5TK2tN0eQx8XYo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDp8H7SW9lX38fWe1TT+2GmLDXpwQcg209L91LhbTch2/JUjZJFZVaK3BbcRAAtTdEmqeOQg== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cc82:0:b0:410:d2b0:1a07 with SMTP id p2-20020aa7cc82000000b00410d2b01a07mr30100562edt.359.1647435779143; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 06:02:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.26.57.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k7-20020aa7c047000000b004132d3b60aasm931534edo.78.2022.03.16.06.02.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 16 Mar 2022 06:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 15:02:56 +0200 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Tobias Waldekranz Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli , Jiri Pirko , Ivan Vecera , Roopa Prabhu , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Russell King , Petr Machata , Ido Schimmel , Matt Johnston , Cooper Lees , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 12/15] net: dsa: Handle MST state changes Message-ID: <20220316130256.3hgbllxioz4igxen@skbuf> References: <20220315002543.190587-1-tobias@waldekranz.com> <20220315002543.190587-13-tobias@waldekranz.com> <20220315164249.sjgi6wbdpgehc6m6@skbuf> <87zglqjkmk.fsf@waldekranz.com> <87wngujkdm.fsf@waldekranz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wngujkdm.fsf@waldekranz.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:51:17AM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote: > > Question though: > > > >>> + err = dsa_port_msti_fast_age(dp, state->msti); > > > > If _msti_fast_age returns an error here, do we want that to bubble up to > > the bridge? It seems more important to keep the bridge in sync with the > > hardware. I.e. the hardware state has already been successfully synced, > > we just weren't able to flush all VLANs for some reason. We could revert > > the state I guess, but what if that fails? > > > > Should we settle for a log message? > > Or should we set the extack message? Similar to how we report software > fallback of bridging/LAGs? A warning extack and chug along sounds great. The worst that can happen if flushing a VLAN's FDB fails is that the topology will reconverge slower.