netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jiri@resnulli.us, leonro@nvidia.com,
	saeedm@nvidia.com, idosch@idosch.org, michael.chan@broadcom.com,
	simon.horman@corigine.com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/5] devlink: add explicitly locked flavor of the rate node APIs
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 21:20:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220317042023.1470039-3-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220317042023.1470039-1-kuba@kernel.org>

We'll need an explicitly locked rate node API for netdevsim
to switch eswitch mode setting to locked.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
 include/net/devlink.h |  4 ++
 net/core/devlink.c    | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
index fd89a17adea1..a30180c0988a 100644
--- a/include/net/devlink.h
+++ b/include/net/devlink.h
@@ -1490,6 +1490,10 @@ int devl_port_register(struct devlink *devlink,
 		       unsigned int port_index);
 void devl_port_unregister(struct devlink_port *devlink_port);
 
+int devl_rate_leaf_create(struct devlink_port *port, void *priv);
+void devl_rate_leaf_destroy(struct devlink_port *devlink_port);
+void devl_rate_nodes_destroy(struct devlink *devlink);
+
 struct ib_device;
 
 struct net *devlink_net(const struct devlink *devlink);
diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index f2a277053ec6..5aac5370c136 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -2868,7 +2868,7 @@ static int devlink_rate_nodes_check(struct devlink *devlink, u16 mode,
 {
 	struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate;
 
-	/* Take the lock to sync with devlink_rate_nodes_destroy() */
+	/* Take the lock to sync with destroy */
 	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(devlink_rate, &devlink->rate_list, list)
 		if (devlink_rate_is_node(devlink_rate)) {
@@ -9548,30 +9548,26 @@ void devlink_port_attrs_pci_sf_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, u32 contro
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_attrs_pci_sf_set);
 
 /**
- * devlink_rate_leaf_create - create devlink rate leaf
- *
+ * devl_rate_leaf_create - create devlink rate leaf
  * @devlink_port: devlink port object to create rate object on
  * @priv: driver private data
  *
  * Create devlink rate object of type leaf on provided @devlink_port.
- * Throws call trace if @devlink_port already has a devlink rate object.
- *
- * Context: Takes and release devlink->lock <mutex>.
- *
- * Return: -ENOMEM if failed to allocate rate object, 0 otherwise.
  */
-int
-devlink_rate_leaf_create(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, void *priv)
+int devl_rate_leaf_create(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, void *priv)
 {
 	struct devlink *devlink = devlink_port->devlink;
 	struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate;
 
+	devl_assert_locked(devlink_port->devlink);
+
+	if (WARN_ON(devlink_port->devlink_rate))
+		return -EBUSY;
+
 	devlink_rate = kzalloc(sizeof(*devlink_rate), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!devlink_rate)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
-	WARN_ON(devlink_port->devlink_rate);
 	devlink_rate->type = DEVLINK_RATE_TYPE_LEAF;
 	devlink_rate->devlink = devlink;
 	devlink_rate->devlink_port = devlink_port;
@@ -9579,12 +9575,42 @@ devlink_rate_leaf_create(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, void *priv)
 	list_add_tail(&devlink_rate->list, &devlink->rate_list);
 	devlink_port->devlink_rate = devlink_rate;
 	devlink_rate_notify(devlink_rate, DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_NEW);
-	mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock);
 
 	return 0;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_rate_leaf_create);
+
+int
+devlink_rate_leaf_create(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, void *priv)
+{
+	struct devlink *devlink = devlink_port->devlink;
+	int ret;
+
+	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
+	ret = devl_rate_leaf_create(devlink_port, priv);
+	mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock);
+
+	return ret;
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_rate_leaf_create);
 
+void devl_rate_leaf_destroy(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
+{
+	struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate = devlink_port->devlink_rate;
+
+	devl_assert_locked(devlink_port->devlink);
+	if (!devlink_rate)
+		return;
+
+	devlink_rate_notify(devlink_rate, DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_DEL);
+	if (devlink_rate->parent)
+		refcount_dec(&devlink_rate->parent->refcnt);
+	list_del(&devlink_rate->list);
+	devlink_port->devlink_rate = NULL;
+	kfree(devlink_rate);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_rate_leaf_destroy);
+
 /**
  * devlink_rate_leaf_destroy - destroy devlink rate leaf
  *
@@ -9601,32 +9627,25 @@ void devlink_rate_leaf_destroy(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
 		return;
 
 	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
-	devlink_rate_notify(devlink_rate, DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_DEL);
-	if (devlink_rate->parent)
-		refcount_dec(&devlink_rate->parent->refcnt);
-	list_del(&devlink_rate->list);
-	devlink_port->devlink_rate = NULL;
+	devl_rate_leaf_destroy(devlink_port);
 	mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock);
-	kfree(devlink_rate);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_rate_leaf_destroy);
 
 /**
- * devlink_rate_nodes_destroy - destroy all devlink rate nodes on device
- *
+ * devl_rate_nodes_destroy - destroy all devlink rate nodes on device
  * @devlink: devlink instance
  *
  * Unset parent for all rate objects and destroy all rate nodes
  * on specified device.
- *
- * Context: Takes and release devlink->lock <mutex>.
  */
-void devlink_rate_nodes_destroy(struct devlink *devlink)
+void devl_rate_nodes_destroy(struct devlink *devlink)
 {
 	static struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate, *tmp;
 	const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;
 
-	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
+	devl_assert_locked(devlink);
+
 	list_for_each_entry(devlink_rate, &devlink->rate_list, list) {
 		if (!devlink_rate->parent)
 			continue;
@@ -9647,6 +9666,23 @@ void devlink_rate_nodes_destroy(struct devlink *devlink)
 			kfree(devlink_rate);
 		}
 	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_rate_nodes_destroy);
+
+/**
+ * devlink_rate_nodes_destroy - destroy all devlink rate nodes on device
+ *
+ * @devlink: devlink instance
+ *
+ * Unset parent for all rate objects and destroy all rate nodes
+ * on specified device.
+ *
+ * Context: Takes and release devlink->lock <mutex>.
+ */
+void devlink_rate_nodes_destroy(struct devlink *devlink)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
+	devl_rate_nodes_destroy(devlink);
 	mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_rate_nodes_destroy);
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-17  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-17  4:20 [PATCH net-next 0/5] devlink: hold the instance lock in eswitch callbacks Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-17  4:20 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] bnxt: use the devlink instance lock to protect sriov Jakub Kicinski
     [not found]   ` <CACKFLi=O4ffBLgP=Xi_CFzwpFVc+zGRH4pmZ15h_YP-imzNpvw@mail.gmail.com>
2022-03-17 17:45     ` Sriharsha Basavapatna
2022-03-17 18:19       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-17 19:24         ` Sriharsha Basavapatna
2022-03-17  4:20 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-03-17  8:02   ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] devlink: add explicitly locked flavor of the rate node APIs Jiri Pirko
2022-03-17  4:20 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] netdevsim: replace port_list_lock with devlink instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-17  4:20 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] netdevsim: replace vfs_lock " Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-17  4:20 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] devlink: hold the instance lock during eswitch_mode callbacks Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-17  7:52   ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-17 15:41     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-17  8:37   ` Jiri Pirko
2022-03-18  8:12 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] devlink: hold the instance lock in eswitch callbacks Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220317042023.1470039-3-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).