Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-06-20T08:31:26Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1542 bytes --]

On 06/20/2012 06:45 AM, Bhupesh SHARMA wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 10:07 AM
>> To: Bhupesh SHARMA
>> Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> next@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
>> federico.vaga@gmail.com; Giancarlo ASNAGHI; wg@grandegger.com;
>> mkl@pengutronix.de
>> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
>>
>> From: Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@st.com>
>> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:27:11 +0800
>>
>>> clk_get/clk_put* variants are usually used by ARM platforms.
>>> Protecting their calls under macro 'CONFIG_HAVE_CLK' should solve the
>> problem.
>>
>> No, we don't pepper foo.c files with crappy ifdefs.
>
> So, whether adding a check in Kconfig for HAVE_CLK be a proper solution ?
> But that will limit the compilation of this driver for only platforms which are ARM based.
>
> One may need to support this driver on x86 like platforms also..

I think the driver is currently used/tested only on ARM only, so what
about adding a HAVE_CLK dependency, until Viresh Kumar's patches are
available in net-next. Later we can remove it.

regards, Marc

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]