From: "dust.li" <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>,
kgraul@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: Send out the remaining data in sndbuf before close
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 17:04:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220328090411.GI35207@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1648447836-111521-1-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 02:10:36PM +0800, Wen Gu wrote:
>The current autocork algorithms will delay the data transmission
>in BH context to smc_release_cb() when sock_lock is hold by user.
>
>So there is a possibility that when connection is being actively
>closed (sock_lock is hold by user now), some corked data still
>remains in sndbuf, waiting to be sent by smc_release_cb(). This
>will cause:
>
>- smc_close_stream_wait(), which is called under the sock_lock,
> has a high probability of timeout because data transmission is
> delayed until sock_lock is released.
>
>- Unexpected data sends may happen after connction closed and use
> the rtoken which has been deleted by remote peer through
> LLC_DELETE_RKEY messages.
>
>So this patch will try to send out the remaining corked data in
>sndbuf before active close process, to ensure data integrity and
>avoid unexpected data transmission after close.
I think this issue should also happen if TCP_CORK is set and
autocorking is not enabled ?
Autocorking and delaying the TX from BH to smc_release_cb() greatly
increased the probability of this problem.
>
>Reported-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>Fixes: 6b88af839d20 ("net/smc: don't send in the BH context if sock_owned_by_user")
>Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
>---
> net/smc/smc_close.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/net/smc/smc_close.c b/net/smc/smc_close.c
>index 292e4d9..676cb23 100644
>--- a/net/smc/smc_close.c
>+++ b/net/smc/smc_close.c
>@@ -57,6 +57,9 @@ static void smc_close_stream_wait(struct smc_sock *smc, long timeout)
> if (!smc_tx_prepared_sends(&smc->conn))
> return;
>
>+ /* Send out corked data remaining in sndbuf */
>+ smc_tx_pending(&smc->conn);
>+
> smc->wait_close_tx_prepared = 1;
> add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
> while (!signal_pending(current) && timeout) {
>--
>1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-28 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-28 6:10 [PATCH net] net/smc: Send out the remaining data in sndbuf before close Wen Gu
2022-03-28 9:04 ` dust.li [this message]
2022-03-28 9:55 ` Wen Gu
2022-03-28 10:02 ` Karsten Graul
2022-03-28 23:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220328090411.GI35207@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).