From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] bpf: allow writing to a subset of sock fields from lsm progtype
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:16:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220328181644.1748789-5-sdf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220328181644.1748789-1-sdf@google.com>
For now, allow only the obvious ones, like sk_priority and sk_mark.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
index 9cc2f0bf78f1..86e2ec2ce7fd 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
@@ -332,7 +332,65 @@ bool bpf_lsm_is_sleepable_hook(u32 btf_id)
const struct bpf_prog_ops lsm_prog_ops = {
};
+static int lsm_btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
+ const struct btf *btf,
+ const struct btf_type *t, int off,
+ int size, enum bpf_access_type atype,
+ u32 *next_btf_id,
+ enum bpf_type_flag *flag)
+{
+ const struct btf_type *sock_type;
+ struct btf *btf_vmlinux;
+ s32 type_id;
+ size_t end;
+
+ if (atype == BPF_READ)
+ return btf_struct_access(log, btf, t, off, size, atype, next_btf_id,
+ flag);
+
+ btf_vmlinux = bpf_get_btf_vmlinux();
+ if (!btf_vmlinux) {
+ bpf_log(log, "no vmlinux btf\n");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ type_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf_vmlinux, "sock", BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
+ if (type_id < 0) {
+ bpf_log(log, "'struct sock' not found in vmlinux btf\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ sock_type = btf_type_by_id(btf_vmlinux, type_id);
+
+ if (t != sock_type) {
+ bpf_log(log, "only 'struct sock' writes are supported\n");
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+
+ switch (off) {
+ case bpf_ctx_range(struct sock, sk_priority):
+ end = offsetofend(struct sock, sk_priority);
+ break;
+ case bpf_ctx_range(struct sock, sk_mark):
+ end = offsetofend(struct sock, sk_mark);
+ break;
+ default:
+ bpf_log(log, "no write support to 'struct sock' at off %d\n", off);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+
+ if (off + size > end) {
+ bpf_log(log,
+ "write access at off %d with size %d beyond the member of 'struct sock' ended at %zu\n",
+ off, size, end);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+
+ return NOT_INIT;
+}
+
const struct bpf_verifier_ops lsm_verifier_ops = {
.get_func_proto = bpf_lsm_func_proto,
.is_valid_access = btf_ctx_access,
+ .btf_struct_access = lsm_btf_struct_access,
};
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 1d2f2e7babb2..d42ee0033755 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -12843,7 +12843,8 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
insn->code = BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM |
BPF_SIZE((insn)->code);
env->prog->aux->num_exentries++;
- } else if (resolve_prog_type(env->prog) != BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS) {
+ } else if (resolve_prog_type(env->prog) != BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS &&
+ resolve_prog_type(env->prog) != BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM) {
verbose(env, "Writes through BTF pointers are not allowed\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.35.1.1021.g381101b075-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-28 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-28 18:16 [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] bpf: cgroup_sock lsm flavor Stanislav Fomichev
2022-03-28 18:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] bpf: add bpf_func_t and trampoline helpers Stanislav Fomichev
2022-03-28 18:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] bpf: per-cgroup lsm flavor Stanislav Fomichev
2022-03-28 22:36 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-28 22:36 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-28 18:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] bpf: minimize number of allocated lsm slots per program Stanislav Fomichev
2022-03-28 18:16 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2022-03-28 18:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/7] libbpf: add lsm_cgoup_sock type Stanislav Fomichev
2022-03-28 18:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] selftests/bpf: lsm_cgroup functional test Stanislav Fomichev
2022-03-28 18:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: verify lsm_cgroup struct sock access Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220328181644.1748789-5-sdf@google.com \
--to=sdf@google.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).