From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8970BC433EF for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 06:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229934AbiDEGB5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 02:01:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35052 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229454AbiDEGBz (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 02:01:55 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C95FBA2; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 22:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id i27so17296214ejd.9; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 22:59:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Rgq5iROBrypUjKZXC6G4OewAtE9hWW/Gme2bB8GXjJo=; b=MCJVV7ek7/4/fiFRv/NT7c2FM1qIfwLkTOvYlBNbwfuCxCybryCTWxitSQbpLTlXHf 2P1hD5dtOcBTcZcMVVNl4vMqQVkzBz5nNcZd5iS6NGgRK8YUfx8XUjeMblQJUikYP6Yd H2ob+aNdEu6f+jfK3D4Iqe0+R6Eq0BJF1jVWjVul+BvVg795DbfYXsxC0WZ8r7mATelO Hc71Vx5HOT8NbnMF8ejW0r558CYKaoVWthdeh0YXTPJFPTlgSpAMMUG2NcNp9DwnsnZ1 63FGeLbOKRpFm0YcQyg/D+1yXxFcCJCnPKxnUnOChVDacAMEgFNYoqkEFbN3tN+EcBy4 TiRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Rgq5iROBrypUjKZXC6G4OewAtE9hWW/Gme2bB8GXjJo=; b=KcCo7INtA7lSgN4ZdN2qm6Oa6bL++h1eZK+/EcvfPEf7NhSLRXHj4ZIFBhVxg/AogF aEJTlOFsUa2osQI2m98ZJTalvLyXmDZ806DV510c8RglpDaaJDksuWUHOXra1QB3XCu1 0XQa3ot/5U8kQAKlSy57nfQ9HsUqL7pUbydnXQNhUQWsDJAS17W7tPFvxPaaGQFx3GcZ FgbEtr27BDK5G2Ps1sGa0QxJQ+UjInrKdWD8ZEjPU7ctqUGCMz925R+lF6AgDUkb2SH8 HTzBo7At0yty/lYXepzBVP/a6haYCzC9ibezsm3b52Ef9q45QWmj5K5tszaqGFl1u6e7 KS3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531OjytEn6y+t4RnkEId9f6EN1VKa5jGRn3raZU9F645jl8ohidl R2Z0Z1PexxgCDwLKkxYEUMc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx3Dt/WfNhS4rp3hSkGVQpyPJIZElGz+DTkY6bVwjHNNIWaiL+ooU6OwxdNHMKNB4a2vPFgPg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:97c7:b0:6e0:defd:342d with SMTP id js7-20020a17090797c700b006e0defd342dmr1835770ejc.231.1649138397017; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 22:59:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hoboy.vegasvil.org (81-223-89-254.static.upcbusiness.at. [81.223.89.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dn4-20020a17090794c400b006dbec4f4acbsm5199369ejc.6.2022.04.04.22.59.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 04 Apr 2022 22:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 22:59:54 -0700 From: Richard Cochran To: Michael Walle Cc: Andrew Lunn , davem@davemloft.net, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, kuba@kernel.org, kurt@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, mlichvar@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V1 net-next 3/4] net: Let the active time stamping layer be selectable. Message-ID: <20220405055954.GB91955@hoboy.vegasvil.org> References: <20220104014215.GA20062@hoboy.vegasvil.org> <20220404150508.3945833-1-michael@walle.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 07:12:11PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > That would make sense. I guess what bothers me with the current > mechanism is that a feature addition to the PHY in the *future* (the > timestamping support) might break a board - or at least changes the > behavior by suddenly using PHY timestamping. That is a good point, but then something will break in any case. Thanks, Richard