From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Christian Benvenuti <benve@cisco.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Nelson Escobar <neescoba@cisco.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] iommu: Replace uses of IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY with dev_is_dma_coherent()
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 11:14:46 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220406141446.GE2120790@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220406135150.GA21532@lst.de>
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 09:07:30AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Didn't see it
> >
> > I'll move dev_is_dma_coherent to device.h along with
> > device_iommu_mapped() and others then
>
> No. It it is internal for a reason. It also doesn't actually work
> outside of the dma core. E.g. for non-swiotlb ARM configs it will
> not actually work.
Really? It is the only condition that dma_info_to_prot() tests to
decide of IOMMU_CACHE is used or not, so you are saying that there is
a condition where a device can be attached to an iommu_domain and
dev_is_dma_coherent() returns the wrong information? How does
dma-iommu.c safely use it then?
In any case I still need to do something about the places checking
IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY and thinking that means IOMMU_CACHE
works. Any idea?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-06 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-05 16:15 [PATCH 0/5] Make the iommu driver no-snoop block feature consistent Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] iommu: Replace uses of IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY with dev_is_dma_coherent() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 5:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-06 12:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 13:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-06 14:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-04-06 15:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-06 15:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 15:48 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-06 13:56 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-06 14:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 15:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-06 16:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 16:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-06 17:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-07 7:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-07 13:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-07 15:17 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-07 15:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-07 22:37 ` Alex Williamson
2022-04-07 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-07 8:53 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] vfio: Require that devices support DMA cache coherence Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-05 19:10 ` Alex Williamson
2022-04-05 19:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 7:02 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-07 14:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] iommu: Introduce the domain op enforce_cache_coherency() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-05 19:50 ` Alex Williamson
2022-04-05 22:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-05 23:31 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-06 0:08 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-06 7:09 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-06 12:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] vfio: Move the Intel no-snoop control off of IOMMU_CACHE Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] iommu: Delete IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 6:52 ` [PATCH 0/5] Make the iommu driver no-snoop block feature consistent Tian, Kevin
2022-04-07 14:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220406141446.GE2120790@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benve@cisco.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=neescoba@cisco.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).