From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Christian Benvenuti <benve@cisco.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Nelson Escobar <neescoba@cisco.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] iommu: Replace uses of IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY with dev_is_dma_coherent()
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:23:31 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220407152331.GN2120790@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb55a025-348e-800c-e368-48be075d8e9c@arm.com>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 04:17:11PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> For the specific case of overriding PCIe No Snoop (which is more problematic
> from an Arm SMMU PoV) when assigning to a VM, would that not be easier
> solved by just having vfio-pci clear the "Enable No Snoop" control bit in
> the endpoint's PCIe capability?
Ideally.
That was rediscussed recently, apparently there are non-compliant
devices and drivers that just ignore the bit.
Presumably this is why x86 had to move to an IOMMU enforced feature..
> That seems a pretty good summary - I think they're basically all "firmware
> told Linux I'm coherent so I'd better act coherent" cases, but that still
> doesn't necessarily mean that they're *forced* to respect that. One of the
> things on my to-do list is to try adding a DMA_ATTR_NO_SNOOP that can force
> DMA cache maintenance for coherent devices, primarily to hook up in Panfrost
> (where there is a bit of a performance to claw back on the coherent AmLogic
> SoCs by leaving certain buffers non-cacheable).
It would be great to see that in a way that could bring in the few other
GPU drivers doing no-snoop to a formal DMA API instead of hacking
their own stuff with wbinvd calls or whatever.
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-05 16:15 [PATCH 0/5] Make the iommu driver no-snoop block feature consistent Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] iommu: Replace uses of IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY with dev_is_dma_coherent() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 5:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-06 12:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 13:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-06 14:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 15:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-06 15:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 15:48 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-06 13:56 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-06 14:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 15:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-06 16:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 16:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-06 17:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-07 7:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-07 13:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-07 15:17 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-07 15:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-04-07 22:37 ` Alex Williamson
2022-04-07 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-07 8:53 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] vfio: Require that devices support DMA cache coherence Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-05 19:10 ` Alex Williamson
2022-04-05 19:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 7:02 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-07 14:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] iommu: Introduce the domain op enforce_cache_coherency() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-05 19:50 ` Alex Williamson
2022-04-05 22:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-05 23:31 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-06 0:08 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-06 7:09 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-06 12:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] vfio: Move the Intel no-snoop control off of IOMMU_CACHE Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] iommu: Delete IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-06 6:52 ` [PATCH 0/5] Make the iommu driver no-snoop block feature consistent Tian, Kevin
2022-04-07 14:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220407152331.GN2120790@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benve@cisco.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=neescoba@cisco.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).