Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	linux-netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 01/17] net/mlx5: Simplify IPsec flow steering init/cleanup functions
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 09:46:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220410164620.2dfzhx6qt4cg6b6o@sx1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f7001272e4dc51fcef031bf896a7e01a2b4b7f6.1649578827.git.leonro@nvidia.com>

On 10 Apr 11:28, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>
>Cleanup IPsec FS initialization and cleanup functions.

Can you be more clear about what are you cleaning up ?

unfolding/joining static functions shouldn't be considered as cleanup.

Also i don't agree these patches should go to mlx5-next, we need to avoid
bloating  mlx5-next.
Many of these patches are purely ipsec, yes i understand you are heavily
modifying include/linux/mlx5/accel.h but from what I can tell, it's not
affecting rdma.

Please give me a chance to review the whole series until next week as i am
out of office this week.

>
>Reviewed-by: Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com>
>Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>---
> .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c       |  4 +-
> .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.c    | 73 ++++++-------------
> .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.h    |  4 +-
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
>index c280a18ff002..5a10755dd4f1 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
>@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ int mlx5e_ipsec_init(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
> 	}
>
> 	priv->ipsec = ipsec;
>-	mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_init(priv);
>+	mlx5e_ipsec_fs_init(ipsec);
> 	netdev_dbg(priv->netdev, "IPSec attached to netdevice\n");
> 	return 0;
> }
>@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ void mlx5e_ipsec_cleanup(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
> 	if (!ipsec)
> 		return;
>
>-	mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_cleanup(priv);
>+	mlx5e_ipsec_fs_cleanup(ipsec);
> 	destroy_workqueue(ipsec->wq);
>
> 	kfree(ipsec);
>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.c
>index 66b529e36ea1..869b5692e9b9 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.c
>@@ -632,81 +632,54 @@ void mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_del_rule(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> 		tx_del_rule(priv, ipsec_rule);
> }
>
>-static void fs_cleanup_tx(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
>-{
>-	mutex_destroy(&priv->ipsec->tx_fs->mutex);
>-	WARN_ON(priv->ipsec->tx_fs->refcnt);
>-	kfree(priv->ipsec->tx_fs);
>-	priv->ipsec->tx_fs = NULL;
>-}
>-
>-static void fs_cleanup_rx(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
>+void mlx5e_ipsec_fs_cleanup(struct mlx5e_ipsec *ipsec)
> {
> 	struct mlx5e_accel_fs_esp_prot *fs_prot;
> 	struct mlx5e_accel_fs_esp *accel_esp;
> 	enum accel_fs_esp_type i;
>
>-	accel_esp = priv->ipsec->rx_fs;
>+	if (!ipsec->rx_fs)
>+		return;
>+
>+	mutex_destroy(&ipsec->tx_fs->mutex);
>+	WARN_ON(ipsec->tx_fs->refcnt);
>+	kfree(ipsec->tx_fs);
>+
>+	accel_esp = ipsec->rx_fs;
> 	for (i = 0; i < ACCEL_FS_ESP_NUM_TYPES; i++) {
> 		fs_prot = &accel_esp->fs_prot[i];
> 		mutex_destroy(&fs_prot->prot_mutex);
> 		WARN_ON(fs_prot->refcnt);
> 	}
>-	kfree(priv->ipsec->rx_fs);
>-	priv->ipsec->rx_fs = NULL;
>-}
>-
>-static int fs_init_tx(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
>-{
>-	priv->ipsec->tx_fs =
>-		kzalloc(sizeof(struct mlx5e_ipsec_tx), GFP_KERNEL);
>-	if (!priv->ipsec->tx_fs)
>-		return -ENOMEM;
>-
>-	mutex_init(&priv->ipsec->tx_fs->mutex);
>-	return 0;
>+	kfree(ipsec->rx_fs);
> }
>
>-static int fs_init_rx(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
>+int mlx5e_ipsec_fs_init(struct mlx5e_ipsec *ipsec)
> {
> 	struct mlx5e_accel_fs_esp_prot *fs_prot;
> 	struct mlx5e_accel_fs_esp *accel_esp;
> 	enum accel_fs_esp_type i;
>+	int err = -ENOMEM;
>
>-	priv->ipsec->rx_fs =
>-		kzalloc(sizeof(struct mlx5e_accel_fs_esp), GFP_KERNEL);
>-	if (!priv->ipsec->rx_fs)
>+	ipsec->tx_fs = kzalloc(sizeof(*ipsec->tx_fs), GFP_KERNEL);
>+	if (!ipsec->tx_fs)
> 		return -ENOMEM;
>
>-	accel_esp = priv->ipsec->rx_fs;
>+	ipsec->rx_fs = kzalloc(sizeof(*ipsec->rx_fs), GFP_KERNEL);
>+	if (!ipsec->rx_fs)
>+		goto err_rx;
>+
>+	mutex_init(&ipsec->tx_fs->mutex);
>+
>+	accel_esp = ipsec->rx_fs;
> 	for (i = 0; i < ACCEL_FS_ESP_NUM_TYPES; i++) {
> 		fs_prot = &accel_esp->fs_prot[i];
> 		mutex_init(&fs_prot->prot_mutex);
> 	}
>
> 	return 0;
>-}
>-
>-void mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_cleanup(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
>-{
>-	if (!priv->ipsec->rx_fs)
>-		return;
>-
>-	fs_cleanup_tx(priv);
>-	fs_cleanup_rx(priv);
>-}
>-
>-int mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_init(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
>-{
>-	int err;
>-
>-	err = fs_init_tx(priv);
>-	if (err)
>-		return err;
>-
>-	err = fs_init_rx(priv);
>-	if (err)
>-		fs_cleanup_tx(priv);
>
>+err_rx:
>+	kfree(ipsec->tx_fs);
> 	return err;
> }
>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.h
>index b70953979709..8e0e829ab58f 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.h
>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.h
>@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
> #include "ipsec_offload.h"
> #include "en/fs.h"
>
>-void mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_cleanup(struct mlx5e_priv *priv);
>-int mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_init(struct mlx5e_priv *priv);
>+void mlx5e_ipsec_fs_cleanup(struct mlx5e_ipsec *ipsec);
>+int mlx5e_ipsec_fs_init(struct mlx5e_ipsec *ipsec);
> int mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_add_rule(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> 				  struct mlx5_accel_esp_xfrm_attrs *attrs,
> 				  u32 ipsec_obj_id,
>-- 
>2.35.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-10 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-10  8:28 [PATCH mlx5-next 00/17] Extra IPsec cleanup Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 01/17] net/mlx5: Simplify IPsec flow steering init/cleanup functions Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10 16:46   ` Saeed Mahameed [this message]
2022-04-10 17:21     ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10 21:58       ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-04-11  6:37         ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 02/17] net/mlx5: Check IPsec TX flow steering namespace in advance Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10 23:46   ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-04-11  6:21     ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 03/17] net/mlx5: Don't hide fallback to software IPsec in FS code Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 04/17] net/mlx5: Reduce useless indirection in IPsec FS add/delete flows Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 05/17] net/mlx5: Store IPsec ESN update work in XFRM state Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 06/17] net/mlx5: Remove useless validity check Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 07/17] net/mlx5: Merge various control path IPsec headers into one file Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 08/17] net/mlx5: Remove accel notations and indirections from esp functions Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 09/17] net/mlx5: Simplify HW context interfaces by using SA entry Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 10/17] net/mlx5: Clean IPsec FS add/delete rules Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 11/17] net/mlx5: Make sure that no dangling IPsec FS pointers exist Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 12/17] net/mlx5: Don't advertise IPsec netdev support for non-IPsec device Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 13/17] net/mlx5: Simplify IPsec capabilities logic Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 14/17] net/mlx5: Remove not-supported ICV length Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 15/17] net/mlx5: Cleanup XFRM attributes struct Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 16/17] net/mlx5: Allow future addition of IPsec object modifiers Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-10  8:28 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 17/17] net/mlx5: Don't perform lookup after already known sec_path Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220410164620.2dfzhx6qt4cg6b6o@sx1 \
    --to=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=raeds@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox