From: Boris Sukholitko <boris.sukholitko@broadcom.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
zhang kai <zhangkaiheb@126.com>,
Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com>,
Ilya Lifshits <ilya.lifshits@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] net/sched: flower: Consider the number of tags for vlan filters
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 14:40:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220412114049.GA2451@noodle> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YlVd79bM00wuK9yW@nanopsycho>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2471 bytes --]
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 01:09:35PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:02:36PM CEST, boris.sukholitko@broadcom.com wrote:
> >Currently the existence of vlan filters is conditional on the vlan
> >protocol being matched in the tc rule. I.e. the following rule:
> >
> >tc filter add dev eth1 ingress flower vlan_prio 5
> >
> >is illegal because we lack protocol 802.1q in the rule.
> >
> >Having the num_of_vlans filter configured removes this restriction. The
> >following rule becomes ok:
> >
> >tc filter add dev eth1 ingress flower num_of_vlans 1 vlan_prio 5
> >
> >because we know that the packet is single tagged.
> >
> >We achieve the above by having is_vlan_key helper look at the number of
>
> Sorry to be a nitpicker, but who's "we"? When I read the patch
> description, I need to understand clearly what the patch is doing, which
> is not this case. You suppose to command the codebase what to do.
> I fail to see that :/
>
>
What do you think of the following description? The description consists
of two parts: the first provides motivation for the patch, the second is
the way the motivation is implemented. I've judiciously edited out the
"we"-word. :)
<description>
Currently the existence of vlan filters is conditional on the vlan
protocol being matched in the tc rule. I.e. the following rule:
tc filter add dev eth1 ingress flower vlan_prio 5
is illegal because vlan protocol (e.g. 802.1q) does not appear in the rule.
Having the num_of_vlans filter configured removes this restriction. The
following rule becomes ok:
tc filter add dev eth1 ingress flower num_of_vlans 1 vlan_prio 5
because having num_of_vlans==1 implies that the packet is single tagged.
To make the above possible, is_vlan_key helper is changed to look at the
number of vlans in addition to the vlan ethertype.
Outer tag vlan filters (e.g. vlan_prio) require the number of vlan tags
be greater than 0. Inner filters (e.g. cvlan_prio) require the number of
vlan tags be greater than 1.
Number of vlans filter may cause ethertype to be set to 0.
fl_set_key_vlan is changed to accomodate this.
</description>
Thanks,
Boris.
> >vlans in addition to the vlan ethertype. Outer tag vlan filters (e.g.
> >vlan_prio) require the number of vlan tags be greater than 0. Inner
> >filters (e.g. cvlan_prio) require the number of vlan tags be greater
> >than 1.
> >
> >Number of vlans filter may cause ethertype to be set to 0. Check this in
> >fl_set_key_vlan.
> >
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4221 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-12 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-12 10:02 [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] net/sched: flower: match on the number of vlan tags Boris Sukholitko
2022-04-12 10:02 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] net/sched: flower: Helper function for vlan ethtype checks Boris Sukholitko
2022-04-12 10:02 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] net/sched: flower: Reduce identation after is_key_vlan refactoring Boris Sukholitko
2022-04-12 10:02 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] flow_dissector: Add number of vlan tags dissector Boris Sukholitko
2022-04-12 10:02 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] net/sched: flower: Add number of vlan tags filter Boris Sukholitko
2022-04-12 10:02 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] net/sched: flower: Consider the number of tags for vlan filters Boris Sukholitko
2022-04-12 11:09 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-04-12 11:40 ` Boris Sukholitko [this message]
2022-04-12 12:12 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-04-12 13:16 ` Boris Sukholitko
2022-04-12 14:17 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-04-13 8:14 ` Boris Sukholitko
2022-04-13 11:44 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-04-13 12:11 ` Boris Sukholitko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220412114049.GA2451@noodle \
--to=boris.sukholitko@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=ilya.lifshits@broadcom.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=zhangkaiheb@126.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).