From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com,
Michal Maloszewski <michal.maloszewski@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, sassmann@redhat.com,
Sylwester Dziedziuch <sylwesterx.dziedziuch@intel.com>,
Konrad Jankowski <konrad0.jankowski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] iavf: Fix error when changing ring parameters on ice PF
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 15:47:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220422154752.1fab6496@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220420172624.931237-2-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:26:23 -0700 Tony Nguyen wrote:
> From: Michal Maloszewski <michal.maloszewski@intel.com>
>
> Reset is triggered when ring parameters are being changed through
> ethtool and queues are reconfigured for VF's VSI. If ring is changed
> again immediately, then the next reset could be executed before
> queues could be properly reinitialized on VF's VSI. It caused ice PF
> to mess up the VSI resource tree.
>
> Add a check in iavf_set_ringparam for adapter and VF's queue
> state. If VF is currently resetting or queues are disabled for the VF
> return with EAGAIN error.
Can't we wait for the device to get into the right state?
Throwing EAGAIN back to user space is not very friendly.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
> index 3bb56714beb0..08efbc50fbe9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
> @@ -631,6 +631,11 @@ static int iavf_set_ringparam(struct net_device *netdev,
> if ((ring->rx_mini_pending) || (ring->rx_jumbo_pending))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (adapter->state == __IAVF_RESETTING ||
> + (adapter->state == __IAVF_RUNNING &&
> + (adapter->flags & IAVF_FLAG_QUEUES_DISABLED)))
> + return -EAGAIN;
nit: why add this check in the middle of input validation
(i.e. checking the ring params are supported)?
> if (ring->tx_pending > IAVF_MAX_TXD ||
> ring->tx_pending < IAVF_MIN_TXD ||
> ring->rx_pending > IAVF_MAX_RXD ||
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-22 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-20 17:26 [PATCH net 0/2][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2022-04-20 Tony Nguyen
2022-04-20 17:26 ` [PATCH net 1/2] iavf: Fix error when changing ring parameters on ice PF Tony Nguyen
2022-04-22 22:47 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-04-28 18:10 ` Maloszewski, Michal
2022-04-28 18:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-04-29 13:14 ` Maloszewski, Michal
2022-04-29 17:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-09 15:25 ` Maloszewski, Michal
2022-04-20 17:26 ` [PATCH net 2/2] i40e: i40e_main: fix a missing check on list iterator Tony Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220422154752.1fab6496@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=konrad0.jankowski@intel.com \
--cc=michal.maloszewski@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
--cc=sylwesterx.dziedziuch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).