public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	acme@kernel.org, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: arm-spe: Fix SPE events with phys addresses
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 20:59:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220424125951.GD978927@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220421165205.117662-3-timothy.hayes@arm.com>

Hi Timothy,

On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 05:52:04PM +0100, Timothy Hayes wrote:
> This patch corrects a bug whereby SPE collection is invoked with
> pa_enable=1 but synthesized events fail to show physical addresses.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c            |  3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
> index af4d63af8072..e8b577d33e53 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ static int arm_spe_recording_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>  	bool privileged = perf_event_paranoid_check(-1);
>  	struct evsel *tracking_evsel;
>  	int err;
> +	u64 bit;
>  
>  	sper->evlist = evlist;
>  
> @@ -245,6 +246,15 @@ static int arm_spe_recording_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>  	 */
>  	evsel__set_sample_bit(arm_spe_evsel, DATA_SRC);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * The PHYS_ADDR flag does not affect the driver behaviour, it is used to
> +	 * inform that the resulting output's SPE samples contain physical addresses
> +	 * where applicable.
> +	 */
> +	bit = perf_pmu__format_bits(&arm_spe_pmu->format, "pa_enable");
> +	if (arm_spe_evsel->core.attr.config & bit)
> +		evsel__set_sample_bit(arm_spe_evsel, PHYS_ADDR);
> +
>  	/* Add dummy event to keep tracking */
>  	err = parse_events(evlist, "dummy:u", NULL);
>  	if (err)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
> index 151cc38a171c..1a80151baed9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
> @@ -1033,7 +1033,8 @@ arm_spe_synth_events(struct arm_spe *spe, struct perf_session *session)
>  	memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(struct perf_event_attr));
>  	attr.size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr);
>  	attr.type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE;
> -	attr.sample_type = evsel->core.attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_MASK;
> +	attr.sample_type = evsel->core.attr.sample_type &
> +				(PERF_SAMPLE_MASK | PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR);

I verified this patch and I can confirm the physical address can be
dumped successfully.

I have a more general question, seems to me, we need to change the
macro PERF_SAMPLE_MASK in the file util/event.h as below, so
here doesn't need to 'or' the flag PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR anymore.

@Arnaldo, @Jiri, could you confirm if this is the right way to move
forward?  I am not sure why PERF_SAMPLE_MASK doesn't contain the bit
PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR in current code.

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/event.h b/tools/perf/util/event.h
index cdd72e05fd28..c905ac32ebad 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/event.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/event.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct perf_event_attr;
         PERF_SAMPLE_TIME | PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR |          \
        PERF_SAMPLE_ID | PERF_SAMPLE_STREAM_ID |        \
         PERF_SAMPLE_CPU | PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD |         \
-        PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFIER)
+        PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFIER | PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR)

Thanks,
Leo

>  	attr.sample_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_IP | PERF_SAMPLE_TID |
>  			    PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD | PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC |
>  			    PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT | PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR;
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-24 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-21 16:52 [PATCH 0/3] perf: arm-spe: Fix addresses of synthesized Arm SPE events Timothy Hayes
2022-04-21 16:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf: arm-spe: Fix addresses of synthesized " Timothy Hayes
2022-04-24 12:28   ` Leo Yan
2022-04-24 15:22     ` Leo Yan
2022-04-21 16:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf: arm-spe: Fix SPE events with phys addresses Timothy Hayes
2022-04-24 12:59   ` Leo Yan [this message]
2022-04-25  9:12     ` James Clark
2022-04-26 13:19       ` Leo Yan
2022-04-21 16:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf test: Add perf_event_attr test for Arm SPE Timothy Hayes
2022-04-24 14:53   ` Leo Yan
2022-04-28 13:41     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220424125951.GD978927@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s \
    --to=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=timothy.hayes@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox