From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@corigine.com,
Bin Chen <bin.chen@corigine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] nfp: VF rate limit support
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:53:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220425165321.1856ebb7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220422131945.948311-1-simon.horman@corigine.com>
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 15:19:45 +0200 Simon Horman wrote:
> + if (max_tx_rate > 0 || min_tx_rate > 0) {
> + if (max_tx_rate > 0 && max_tx_rate < min_tx_rate) {
> + nfp_warn(app->cpp, "min-tx-rate exceeds max_tx_rate.\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
This check should be moved to the core, I reckon.
> + if (max_tx_rate > NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX || min_tx_rate > NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX) {
Please wrap the lines at 80 chars, it's actually going to be easier
to read here.
> + nfp_warn(app->cpp, "tx-rate exceeds 0x%x.\n", NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX);
Does it really make sense to print the rate as hex?
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> @@ -261,5 +294,18 @@ int nfp_app_get_vf_config(struct net_device *netdev, int vf,
> ivi->trusted = FIELD_GET(NFP_NET_VF_CFG_CTRL_TRUST, flags);
> ivi->linkstate = FIELD_GET(NFP_NET_VF_CFG_CTRL_LINK_STATE, flags);
>
> + err = nfp_net_sriov_check(app, vf, NFP_NET_VF_CFG_MB_CAP_RATE, "rate");
> + if (!err) {
> + rate = readl(app->pf->vfcfg_tbl2 + vf_offset + NFP_NET_VF_CFG_RATE);
> +
> + ivi->max_tx_rate = FIELD_GET(NFP_NET_VF_CFG_MAX_RATE, rate);
> + ivi->min_tx_rate = FIELD_GET(NFP_NET_VF_CFG_MIN_RATE, rate);
> +
> + if (ivi->max_tx_rate == NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX)
> + ivi->max_tx_rate = 0;
If rate == NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX means unset then the check on set should
disallow it, IOW:
if (max_tx_rate >= NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX ||
min_tx_rate >= NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX) {
nfp_war(...
no?
> + if (ivi->min_tx_rate == NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX)
> + ivi->max_tx_rate = 0;
*squint* you check min and clear max, is this intentional?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-25 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-22 13:19 [PATCH net-next] nfp: VF rate limit support Simon Horman
2022-04-25 23:53 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-04-29 8:54 ` Bin Chen
2022-04-29 18:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-04-29 18:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220425165321.1856ebb7@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=bin.chen@corigine.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@corigine.com \
--cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).