From: Kevin Mitchell <kevmitch@arista.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: kevmitch@arista.com,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
Takuma Ueba <t.ueba11@gmail.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] igb: skip phy status check where unavailable
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:55:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220429235554.13290-1-kevmitch@arista.com> (raw)
igb_read_phy_reg() will silently return, leaving phy_data untouched, if
hw->ops.read_reg isn't set. Depending on the uninitialized value of
phy_data, this led to the phy status check either succeeding immediately
or looping continuously for 2 seconds before emitting a noisy err-level
timeout. This message went out to the console even though there was no
actual problem.
Instead, first check if there is read_reg function pointer. If not,
proceed without trying to check the phy status register.
Fixes: b72f3f72005d ("igb: When GbE link up, wait for Remote receiver status condition")
Signed-off-by: Kevin Mitchell <kevmitch@arista.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
index 34b33b21e0dc..68be2976f539 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
@@ -5505,7 +5505,8 @@ static void igb_watchdog_task(struct work_struct *work)
break;
}
- if (adapter->link_speed != SPEED_1000)
+ if (adapter->link_speed != SPEED_1000 ||
+ !hw->phy.ops.read_reg)
goto no_wait;
/* wait for Remote receiver status OK */
--
2.35.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-04-29 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-29 23:55 Kevin Mitchell [this message]
2022-05-17 4:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igb: skip phy status check where unavailable G, GurucharanX
2022-05-17 6:23 ` G, GurucharanX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220429235554.13290-1-kevmitch@arista.com \
--to=kevmitch@arista.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=t.ueba11@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox