netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Íñigo Huguet" <ihuguet@redhat.com>
To: ecree.xilinx@gmail.com, habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com, amaftei@solarflare.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"Íñigo Huguet" <ihuguet@redhat.com>,
	"Tianhao Zhao" <tizhao@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] sfc: fix wrong tx channel offset with efx_separate_tx_channels
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 14:59:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220511125941.55812-2-ihuguet@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220511125941.55812-1-ihuguet@redhat.com>

tx_channel_offset is calculated in efx_allocate_msix_channels, but it is
also calculated again in efx_set_channels because it was originally done
there, and when efx_allocate_msix_channels was introduced it was
forgotten to be removed from efx_set_channels.

Moreover, the old calculation is wrong when using
efx_separate_tx_channels because now we can have XDP channels after the
TX channels, so n_channels - n_tx_channels doesn't point to the first TX
channel.

Remove the old calculation from efx_set_channels, and add the
initialization of this variable if MSI or legacy interrupts are used,
next to the initialization of the rest of the related variables, where
it was missing.

Fixes: 3990a8fffbda ("sfc: allocate channels for XDP tx queues")
Reported-by: Tianhao Zhao <tizhao@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c | 17 +++++------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c
index 40df910aa140..da2db6791907 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c
@@ -241,14 +241,9 @@ static int efx_allocate_msix_channels(struct efx_nic *efx,
 	n_channels -= efx->n_xdp_channels;
 
 	if (efx_separate_tx_channels) {
-		efx->n_tx_channels =
-			min(max(n_channels / 2, 1U),
-			    efx->max_tx_channels);
-		efx->tx_channel_offset =
-			n_channels - efx->n_tx_channels;
-		efx->n_rx_channels =
-			max(n_channels -
-			    efx->n_tx_channels, 1U);
+		efx->n_tx_channels = min(max(n_channels / 2, 1U), efx->max_tx_channels);
+		efx->tx_channel_offset = n_channels - efx->n_tx_channels;
+		efx->n_rx_channels = max(n_channels - efx->n_tx_channels, 1U);
 	} else {
 		efx->n_tx_channels = min(n_channels, efx->max_tx_channels);
 		efx->tx_channel_offset = 0;
@@ -324,6 +319,7 @@ int efx_probe_interrupts(struct efx_nic *efx)
 		efx->n_channels = 1;
 		efx->n_rx_channels = 1;
 		efx->n_tx_channels = 1;
+		efx->tx_channel_offset = 0;
 		efx->n_xdp_channels = 0;
 		efx->xdp_channel_offset = efx->n_channels;
 		rc = pci_enable_msi(efx->pci_dev);
@@ -344,6 +340,7 @@ int efx_probe_interrupts(struct efx_nic *efx)
 		efx->n_channels = 1 + (efx_separate_tx_channels ? 1 : 0);
 		efx->n_rx_channels = 1;
 		efx->n_tx_channels = 1;
+		efx->tx_channel_offset = 1;
 		efx->n_xdp_channels = 0;
 		efx->xdp_channel_offset = efx->n_channels;
 		efx->legacy_irq = efx->pci_dev->irq;
@@ -979,10 +976,6 @@ int efx_set_channels(struct efx_nic *efx)
 	struct efx_channel *channel;
 	int rc;
 
-	efx->tx_channel_offset =
-		efx_separate_tx_channels ?
-		efx->n_channels - efx->n_tx_channels : 0;
-
 	if (efx->xdp_tx_queue_count) {
 		EFX_WARN_ON_PARANOID(efx->xdp_tx_queues);
 
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-11 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-11 12:59 [PATCH net 0/2] sfc: fix some efx_separate_tx_channels errors Íñigo Huguet
2022-05-11 12:59 ` Íñigo Huguet [this message]
2022-05-12 17:01   ` [PATCH net 1/2] sfc: fix wrong tx channel offset with efx_separate_tx_channels Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-11 12:59 ` [PATCH net 2/2] sfc: do not initialize non existing queues " Íñigo Huguet
2022-05-13 11:07   ` Martin Habets
2022-05-13 12:37     ` Martin Habets
2022-05-24 15:36       ` Íñigo Huguet
2022-05-27  6:14         ` Martin Habets

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220511125941.55812-2-ihuguet@redhat.com \
    --to=ihuguet@redhat.com \
    --cc=amaftei@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tizhao@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).