From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
m.chetan.kumar@intel.com, linuxwwan@intel.com,
loic.poulain@linaro.org, ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com,
johannes@sipsolutions.net
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: wwan: iosm: remove pointless null check
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 17:43:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220519004342.2109832-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
GCC 12 warns:
drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c: In function ‘ipc_protocol_dl_td_process’:
drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c:406:13: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘true’ for the address of ‘cb’ will never be NULL [-Waddress]
406 | if (!IPC_CB(skb)) {
| ^
Indeed the check seems entirely pointless. Hopefully the other
validation checks will catch if the cb is bad, but it can't be
NULL.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
CC: m.chetan.kumar@intel.com
CC: linuxwwan@intel.com
CC: loic.poulain@linaro.org
CC: ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com
CC: johannes@sipsolutions.net
---
drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c b/drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c
index c6b032f95d2e..4627847c6daa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_protocol_ops.c
@@ -372,8 +372,6 @@ bool ipc_protocol_dl_td_prepare(struct iosm_protocol *ipc_protocol,
struct sk_buff *ipc_protocol_dl_td_process(struct iosm_protocol *ipc_protocol,
struct ipc_pipe *pipe)
{
- u32 tail =
- le32_to_cpu(ipc_protocol->p_ap_shm->tail_array[pipe->pipe_nr]);
struct ipc_protocol_td *p_td;
struct sk_buff *skb;
@@ -403,14 +401,6 @@ struct sk_buff *ipc_protocol_dl_td_process(struct iosm_protocol *ipc_protocol,
goto ret;
}
- if (!IPC_CB(skb)) {
- dev_err(ipc_protocol->dev, "pipe# %d, tail: %d skb_cb is NULL",
- pipe->pipe_nr, tail);
- ipc_pcie_kfree_skb(ipc_protocol->pcie, skb);
- skb = NULL;
- goto ret;
- }
-
if (p_td->buffer.address != IPC_CB(skb)->mapping) {
dev_err(ipc_protocol->dev, "invalid buf=%llx or skb=%p",
(unsigned long long)p_td->buffer.address, skb->data);
--
2.34.3
next reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-19 0:43 Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-05-19 7:12 ` [PATCH net-next] net: wwan: iosm: remove pointless null check Kumar, M Chetan
2022-05-20 1:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220519004342.2109832-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linuxwwan@intel.com \
--cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
--cc=m.chetan.kumar@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).