From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10DEC433EF for ; Thu, 19 May 2022 17:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243252AbiESRuB (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 May 2022 13:50:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52154 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243370AbiESRs6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 May 2022 13:48:58 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EAACBA57A; Thu, 19 May 2022 10:48:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6F16618EC; Thu, 19 May 2022 17:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD3DAC36AF2; Thu, 19 May 2022 17:48:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1652982534; bh=+r1r8GFRbG7ATP7YpPleCIYRYj+oHJ89RWr+aaridB4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ab9WIT7Oa7Yx9M9CyQc4rJigtQ6df4mzWw2T2AJXMBJvDxKh0Gk3lCzJRy9UhvoTb y9VoA+mW1lJM3edBHE9MRLt9j9kn+HZzhm0dKDVpF3EbqilnEcHPYqwaAmweUIKb6t fcV4/Frq1VuWA+CHQNPKlWt0pCX2Mp+Iee0kzW41Vbi8zNs0BhccPtd/RFb4JBeB3P IYq8b5HQDLMp1JqzhW6IEt0mePqI0II1D2GD5MMzt9fxjtYMStMAIGyXd+KYXsSBAd vEGVnIxkJcM6l6zNoKZUW+nbJFCFS49VakIev7XUyYrCNH1MARgu0hJyFv/j3D3T4z GjlFyN4x48EQQ== Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 10:48:52 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Saeed Mahameed Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Doug Ledford , Jason Gunthorpe , David Miller , Networking , Leon Romanovsky , Leon Romanovsky , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Shay Drory Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the net tree Message-ID: <20220519104852.0b6afa26@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20220519040345.6yrjromcdistu7vh@sx1> References: <20220519113529.226bc3e2@canb.auug.org.au> <20220519040345.6yrjromcdistu7vh@sx1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 May 2022 21:03:45 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote: > >@@@ -1274,9 -1252,7 +1261,7 @@@ static void mlx5_unload(struct mlx5_cor > > mlx5_ec_cleanup(dev); > > mlx5_sf_hw_table_destroy(dev); > > mlx5_vhca_event_stop(dev); > > - mlx5_cleanup_fs(dev); > > + mlx5_fs_core_cleanup(dev); > >- mlx5_accel_ipsec_cleanup(dev); > >- mlx5_accel_tls_cleanup(dev); > > mlx5_fpga_device_stop(dev); > > mlx5_rsc_dump_cleanup(dev); > > mlx5_hv_vhca_cleanup(dev->hv_vhca); > > I already mentioned this to the netdev maintainers, same conflict should > appear in net-next, this is the correct resolution, Thanks Stephen. FTR could you not have held off the mlx5_$verb_fs() -> mlx5_fs_$verb rename until net-next? This conflict looks avoidable :/