From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Chen Lin <chen45464546@163.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alexander.duyck@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: page_frag: Warn_on when frag_alloc size is bigger than PAGE_SIZE
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 08:47:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220531084704.480133fa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1654011382-2453-1-git-send-email-chen45464546@163.com>
On Tue, 31 May 2022 23:36:22 +0800 Chen Lin wrote:
> At 2022-05-31 22:14:12, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> >On Tue, 31 May 2022 22:41:12 +0800 Chen Lin wrote:
> >> The sample code above cannot completely solve the current problem.
> >> For example, when fragsz is greater than PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE(32768),
> >> __page_frag_cache_refill will return a memory of only 32768 bytes, so
> >> should we continue to expand the PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE? Maybe more
> >> work needs to be done
> >
> >Right, but I can think of two drivers off the top of my head which will
> >allocate <=32k frags but none which will allocate more.
>
> In fact, it is rare to apply for more than one page, so is it necessary to
> change it to support?
I don't really care if it's supported TBH, but I dislike adding
a branch to the fast path just to catch one or two esoteric bad
callers.
Maybe you can wrap the check with some debug CONFIG_ so it won't
run on production builds?
> we can just warning and return, also it is easy to synchronize this simple
> protective measures to lower Linux versions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-31 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1653752373-3172-1-git-send-email-chen45464546@163.com>
2022-05-29 23:30 ` [PATCH] mm: page_frag: Warn_on when frag_alloc size is bigger than PAGE_SIZE Andrew Morton
2022-05-30 13:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Chen Lin
2022-05-30 19:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-30 19:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-31 14:41 ` Chen Lin
2022-05-31 15:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-31 15:36 ` Chen Lin
2022-05-31 15:47 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-05-31 18:28 ` Alexander Duyck
2022-06-01 12:32 ` 愚树
2022-06-01 15:04 ` Alexander Duyck
2022-07-06 15:21 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2022-07-08 8:06 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2022-05-30 20:07 ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-31 14:43 ` [PATCH v3] " Chen Lin
2022-05-31 23:45 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220531084704.480133fa@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=chen45464546@163.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).