* [net 1/6] MAINTAINERS: adjust MELLANOX ETHERNET INNOVA DRIVERS to TLS support removal
2022-06-08 18:58 [pull request][net 0/6] mlx5 fixes 2022-06-08 Saeed Mahameed
@ 2022-06-08 18:58 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-06-08 18:58 ` [net 2/6] Revert "net/mlx5e: Allow relaxed ordering over VFs" Saeed Mahameed
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Saeed Mahameed @ 2022-06-08 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet
Cc: netdev, Lukas Bulwahn, Saeed Mahameed
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Commit 40379a0084c2 ("net/mlx5_fpga: Drop INNOVA TLS support") removes all
files in the directory drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/accel/, but
misses to adjust its reference in MAINTAINERS.
Hence, ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test=patterns complains about a
broken reference.
Remove the file entry to the removed directory in MELLANOX ETHERNET INNOVA
DRIVERS.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 033a01b07f8f..bab9e131ec9c 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -12651,7 +12651,6 @@ L: netdev@vger.kernel.org
S: Supported
W: http://www.mellanox.com
Q: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/
-F: drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/accel/*
F: drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/*
F: drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fpga/*
F: include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc_fpga.h
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [net 2/6] Revert "net/mlx5e: Allow relaxed ordering over VFs"
2022-06-08 18:58 [pull request][net 0/6] mlx5 fixes 2022-06-08 Saeed Mahameed
2022-06-08 18:58 ` [net 1/6] MAINTAINERS: adjust MELLANOX ETHERNET INNOVA DRIVERS to TLS support removal Saeed Mahameed
@ 2022-06-08 18:58 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-06-08 18:58 ` [net 3/6] net/mlx5e: CT: Fix cleanup of CT before cleanup of TC ct rules Saeed Mahameed
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Saeed Mahameed @ 2022-06-08 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet
Cc: netdev, Saeed Mahameed
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
FW is not ready, fix was sent too soon.
This reverts commit f05ec8d9d0d62367b6e1f2cb50d7d2a45e7747cf.
Fixes: f05ec8d9d0d6 ("net/mlx5e: Allow relaxed ordering over VFs")
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/params.c | 3 ++-
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_common.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/params.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/params.c
index 68364484a435..3c1edfa33aa7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/params.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/params.c
@@ -565,7 +565,8 @@ static void mlx5e_build_rx_cq_param(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev,
static u8 rq_end_pad_mode(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, struct mlx5e_params *params)
{
bool lro_en = params->packet_merge.type == MLX5E_PACKET_MERGE_LRO;
- bool ro = MLX5_CAP_GEN(mdev, relaxed_ordering_write);
+ bool ro = pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(mdev->pdev) &&
+ MLX5_CAP_GEN(mdev, relaxed_ordering_write);
return ro && lro_en ?
MLX5_WQ_END_PAD_MODE_NONE : MLX5_WQ_END_PAD_MODE_ALIGN;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_common.c
index 43a536cb81db..c0f409c195bf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_common.c
@@ -38,11 +38,12 @@
void mlx5e_mkey_set_relaxed_ordering(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, void *mkc)
{
+ bool ro_pci_enable = pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(mdev->pdev);
bool ro_write = MLX5_CAP_GEN(mdev, relaxed_ordering_write);
bool ro_read = MLX5_CAP_GEN(mdev, relaxed_ordering_read);
- MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_read, ro_read);
- MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_write, ro_write);
+ MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_read, ro_pci_enable && ro_read);
+ MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_write, ro_pci_enable && ro_write);
}
static int mlx5e_create_mkey(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, u32 pdn,
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [net 3/6] net/mlx5e: CT: Fix cleanup of CT before cleanup of TC ct rules
2022-06-08 18:58 [pull request][net 0/6] mlx5 fixes 2022-06-08 Saeed Mahameed
2022-06-08 18:58 ` [net 1/6] MAINTAINERS: adjust MELLANOX ETHERNET INNOVA DRIVERS to TLS support removal Saeed Mahameed
2022-06-08 18:58 ` [net 2/6] Revert "net/mlx5e: Allow relaxed ordering over VFs" Saeed Mahameed
@ 2022-06-08 18:58 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-06-08 18:58 ` [net 4/6] net/mlx5: E-Switch, pair only capable devices Saeed Mahameed
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Saeed Mahameed @ 2022-06-08 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet
Cc: netdev, Paul Blakey, Oz Shlomo, Saeed Mahameed
From: Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>
CT cleanup assumes that all tc rules were deleted first, and so
is free to delete the CT shared resources (e.g the dr_action
fwd_action which is shared for all tuples). But currently for
uplink, this is happens in reverse, causing the below trace.
CT cleanup is called from:
mlx5e_cleanup_rep_tx()->mlx5e_cleanup_uplink_rep_tx()->
mlx5e_rep_tc_cleanup()->mlx5e_tc_esw_cleanup()->
mlx5_tc_ct_clean()
Only afterwards, tc cleanup is called from:
mlx5e_cleanup_rep_tx()->mlx5e_tc_ht_cleanup()
which would have deleted all the tc ct rules, and so delete
all the offloaded tuples.
Fix this reversing the order of init and on cleanup, which
will result in tc cleanup then ct cleanup.
[ 9443.593347] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 206774 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_action.c:1882 mlx5dr_action_destroy+0x188/0x1a0 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593349] Modules linked in: act_ct nf_flow_table rdma_ucm(O) rdma_cm(O) iw_cm(O) ib_ipoib(O) ib_cm(O) ib_umad(O) mlx5_core(O-) mlxfw(O) mlxdevm(O) auxiliary(O) ib_uverbs(O) psample ib_core(O) mlx_compat(O) ip_gre gre ip_tunnel act_vlan bonding geneve esp6_offload esp6 esp4_offload esp4 act_tunnel_key vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel act_mirred act_skbedit act_gact cls_flower sch_ingress nfnetlink_cttimeout nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo 8021q garp stp ipmi_devintf mrp ipmi_msghandler llc openvswitch nsh nf_conncount nf_nat mst_pciconf(O) dm_multipath sbsa_gwdt uio_pdrv_genirq uio mlxbf_pmc mlxbf_pka mlx_trio mlx_bootctl(O) bluefield_edac sch_fq_codel ip_tables ipv6 crc_ccitt btrfs zstd_compress raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor xor_neon raid6_pq raid1 raid0 crct10dif_ce i2c_mlxbf gpio_mlxbf2 mlxbf_gige aes_neon_bs aes_neon_blk [last unloaded: mlx5_ib]
[ 9443.593419] CPU: 2 PID: 206774 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G O 5.4.0-1023.24.gc14613d-bluefield #1
[ 9443.593422] Hardware name: https://www.mellanox.com BlueField SoC/BlueField SoC, BIOS BlueField:143ebaf Jan 11 2022
[ 9443.593424] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO)
[ 9443.593489] pc : mlx5dr_action_destroy+0x188/0x1a0 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593545] lr : mlx5_ct_fs_smfs_destroy+0x24/0x30 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593546] sp : ffff8000135dbab0
[ 9443.593548] x29: ffff8000135dbab0 x28: ffff0003a6ab8e80
[ 9443.593550] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: ffff0003e07d7000
[ 9443.593552] x25: ffff800009609de0 x24: ffff000397fb2120
[ 9443.593554] x23: ffff0003975c0000 x22: 0000000000000000
[ 9443.593556] x21: ffff0003975f08c0 x20: ffff800009609de0
[ 9443.593558] x19: ffff0003c8a13380 x18: 0000000000000014
[ 9443.593560] x17: 0000000067f5f125 x16: 000000006529c620
[ 9443.593561] x15: 000000000000000b x14: 0000000000000000
[ 9443.593563] x13: 0000000000000002 x12: 0000000000000001
[ 9443.593565] x11: ffff800011108868 x10: 0000000000000000
[ 9443.593567] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff8000117fb270
[ 9443.593569] x7 : ffff0003ebc01288 x6 : 0000000000000000
[ 9443.593571] x5 : ffff800009591ab8 x4 : fffffe000f6d9a20
[ 9443.593572] x3 : 0000000080040001 x2 : fffffe000f6d9a20
[ 9443.593574] x1 : ffff8000095901d8 x0 : 0000000000000025
[ 9443.593577] Call trace:
[ 9443.593634] mlx5dr_action_destroy+0x188/0x1a0 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593688] mlx5_ct_fs_smfs_destroy+0x24/0x30 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593743] mlx5_tc_ct_clean+0x34/0xa8 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593797] mlx5e_tc_esw_cleanup+0x58/0x88 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593851] mlx5e_rep_tc_cleanup+0x24/0x30 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593905] mlx5e_cleanup_rep_tx+0x6c/0x78 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593959] mlx5e_detach_netdev+0x74/0x98 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594013] mlx5e_netdev_change_profile+0x70/0x180 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594067] mlx5e_netdev_attach_nic_profile+0x34/0x40 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594122] mlx5e_vport_rep_unload+0x15c/0x1a8 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594177] mlx5_eswitch_unregister_vport_reps+0x228/0x298 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594231] mlx5e_rep_remove+0x2c/0x38 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594236] auxiliary_bus_remove+0x30/0x50 [auxiliary]
[ 9443.594246] device_release_driver_internal+0x108/0x1d0
[ 9443.594248] driver_detach+0x5c/0xe8
[ 9443.594250] bus_remove_driver+0x64/0xd8
[ 9443.594253] driver_unregister+0x38/0x60
[ 9443.594255] auxiliary_driver_unregister+0x24/0x38 [auxiliary]
[ 9443.594311] mlx5e_rep_cleanup+0x20/0x38 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594365] mlx5e_cleanup+0x18/0x30 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594419] cleanup+0xc/0x20cc [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594424] __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x154/0x2b0
[ 9443.594429] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xf4/0x200
[ 9443.594432] el0_svc_handler+0x38/0xa8
[ 9443.594435] el0_svc+0x10/0x26c
Fixes: d1a3138f7913 ("net/mlx5e: TC, Move flow hashtable to be per rep")
Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Oz Shlomo <ozsh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c | 31 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
index eb90e79388f1..f797fd97d305 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
@@ -950,6 +950,13 @@ static int mlx5e_init_uplink_rep_tx(struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv)
return err;
}
+static void mlx5e_cleanup_uplink_rep_tx(struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv)
+{
+ mlx5e_rep_tc_netdevice_event_unregister(rpriv);
+ mlx5e_rep_bond_cleanup(rpriv);
+ mlx5e_rep_tc_cleanup(rpriv);
+}
+
static int mlx5e_init_rep_tx(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
{
struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv = priv->ppriv;
@@ -961,42 +968,36 @@ static int mlx5e_init_rep_tx(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
return err;
}
- err = mlx5e_tc_ht_init(&rpriv->tc_ht);
- if (err)
- goto err_ht_init;
-
if (rpriv->rep->vport == MLX5_VPORT_UPLINK) {
err = mlx5e_init_uplink_rep_tx(rpriv);
if (err)
goto err_init_tx;
}
+ err = mlx5e_tc_ht_init(&rpriv->tc_ht);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_ht_init;
+
return 0;
-err_init_tx:
- mlx5e_tc_ht_cleanup(&rpriv->tc_ht);
err_ht_init:
+ if (rpriv->rep->vport == MLX5_VPORT_UPLINK)
+ mlx5e_cleanup_uplink_rep_tx(rpriv);
+err_init_tx:
mlx5e_destroy_tises(priv);
return err;
}
-static void mlx5e_cleanup_uplink_rep_tx(struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv)
-{
- mlx5e_rep_tc_netdevice_event_unregister(rpriv);
- mlx5e_rep_bond_cleanup(rpriv);
- mlx5e_rep_tc_cleanup(rpriv);
-}
-
static void mlx5e_cleanup_rep_tx(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
{
struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv = priv->ppriv;
- mlx5e_destroy_tises(priv);
+ mlx5e_tc_ht_cleanup(&rpriv->tc_ht);
if (rpriv->rep->vport == MLX5_VPORT_UPLINK)
mlx5e_cleanup_uplink_rep_tx(rpriv);
- mlx5e_tc_ht_cleanup(&rpriv->tc_ht);
+ mlx5e_destroy_tises(priv);
}
static void mlx5e_rep_enable(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [net 4/6] net/mlx5: E-Switch, pair only capable devices
2022-06-08 18:58 [pull request][net 0/6] mlx5 fixes 2022-06-08 Saeed Mahameed
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-08 18:58 ` [net 3/6] net/mlx5e: CT: Fix cleanup of CT before cleanup of TC ct rules Saeed Mahameed
@ 2022-06-08 18:58 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-06-08 18:58 ` [net 5/6] net/mlx5: Rearm the FW tracer after each tracer event Saeed Mahameed
2022-06-08 18:58 ` [net 6/6] net/mlx5: fs, fail conflicting actions Saeed Mahameed
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Saeed Mahameed @ 2022-06-08 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet
Cc: netdev, Mark Bloch, Roi Dayan, Moshe Shemesh, Saeed Mahameed
From: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
OFFLOADS paring using devcom is possible only on devices
that support LAG. Filter based on lag capabilities.
This fixes an issue where mlx5_get_next_phys_dev() was
called without holding the interface lock.
This issue was found when commit
bc4c2f2e0179 ("net/mlx5: Lag, filter non compatible devices")
added an assert that verifies the interface lock is held.
WARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 1706 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c:642 mlx5_get_next_phys_dev+0xd2/0x100 [mlx5_core]
Modules linked in: mlx5_vdpa vringh vhost_iotlb vdpa mlx5_ib mlx5_core xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xt_addrtype iptable_nat nf_nat br_netfilter rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi rdma_cm iw_cm ib_umad ib_ipoib ib_cm ib_uverbs ib_core overlay fuse [last unloaded: mlx5_core]
CPU: 9 PID: 1706 Comm: devlink Not tainted 5.18.0-rc7+ #11
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:mlx5_get_next_phys_dev+0xd2/0x100 [mlx5_core]
Code: 02 00 75 48 48 8b 85 80 04 00 00 5d c3 31 c0 5d c3 be ff ff ff ff 48 c7 c7 08 41 5b a0 e8 36 87 28 e3 85 c0 0f 85 6f ff ff ff <0f> 0b e9 68 ff ff ff 48 c7 c7 0c 91 cc 84 e8 cb 36 6f e1 e9 4d ff
RSP: 0018:ffff88811bf47458 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811b398000 RCX: 0000000000000001
RDX: 0000000080000000 RSI: ffffffffa05b4108 RDI: ffff88812daaaa78
RBP: ffff88812d050380 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff88811d6b3437
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 00000000fddd3581 R12: ffff88815238c000
R13: ffff88812d050380 R14: ffff8881018aa7e0 R15: ffff88811d6b3428
FS: 00007fc82e18ae80(0000) GS:ffff88842e080000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f9630d1b421 CR3: 0000000149802004 CR4: 0000000000370ea0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
mlx5_esw_offloads_devcom_event+0x99/0x3b0 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_devcom_send_event+0x167/0x1d0 [mlx5_core]
esw_offloads_enable+0x1153/0x1500 [mlx5_core]
? mlx5_esw_offloads_controller_valid+0x170/0x170 [mlx5_core]
? wait_for_completion_io_timeout+0x20/0x20
? mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked+0x318/0x810 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked+0x586/0xc50 [mlx5_core]
? mlx5_eswitch_disable_pf_vf_vports+0x1d0/0x1d0 [mlx5_core]
? mlx5_esw_try_lock+0x1b/0xb0 [mlx5_core]
? mlx5_eswitch_enable+0x270/0x270 [mlx5_core]
? __debugfs_create_file+0x260/0x3e0
mlx5_devlink_eswitch_mode_set+0x27e/0x870 [mlx5_core]
? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x12c0/0x12c0
? esw_offloads_disable+0x250/0x250 [mlx5_core]
? devlink_nl_cmd_trap_get_dumpit+0x470/0x470
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70
devlink_nl_cmd_eswitch_set_doit+0x217/0x620
Fixes: dd3fddb82780 ("net/mlx5: E-Switch, handle devcom events only for ports on the same device")
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c | 18 ------------------
.../mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 9 ++++++---
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.h | 10 ++++++++++
.../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/mlx5_core.h | 1 -
4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c
index 0eb9d74547f8..50422b56a64d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c
@@ -579,17 +579,6 @@ static void *pci_get_other_drvdata(struct device *this, struct device *other)
return pci_get_drvdata(to_pci_dev(other));
}
-static int next_phys_dev(struct device *dev, const void *data)
-{
- struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, *this = (struct mlx5_core_dev *)data;
-
- mdev = pci_get_other_drvdata(this->device, dev);
- if (!mdev)
- return 0;
-
- return _next_phys_dev(mdev, data);
-}
-
static int next_phys_dev_lag(struct device *dev, const void *data)
{
struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, *this = (struct mlx5_core_dev *)data;
@@ -623,13 +612,6 @@ static struct mlx5_core_dev *mlx5_get_next_dev(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev,
return pci_get_drvdata(to_pci_dev(next));
}
-/* Must be called with intf_mutex held */
-struct mlx5_core_dev *mlx5_get_next_phys_dev(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
-{
- lockdep_assert_held(&mlx5_intf_mutex);
- return mlx5_get_next_dev(dev, &next_phys_dev);
-}
-
/* Must be called with intf_mutex held */
struct mlx5_core_dev *mlx5_get_next_phys_dev_lag(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
{
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
index 217cac29057f..2ce3728576d1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
@@ -2690,9 +2690,6 @@ static int mlx5_esw_offloads_devcom_event(int event,
switch (event) {
case ESW_OFFLOADS_DEVCOM_PAIR:
- if (mlx5_get_next_phys_dev(esw->dev) != peer_esw->dev)
- break;
-
if (mlx5_eswitch_vport_match_metadata_enabled(esw) !=
mlx5_eswitch_vport_match_metadata_enabled(peer_esw))
break;
@@ -2744,6 +2741,9 @@ static void esw_offloads_devcom_init(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
if (!MLX5_CAP_ESW(esw->dev, merged_eswitch))
return;
+ if (!mlx5_is_lag_supported(esw->dev))
+ return;
+
mlx5_devcom_register_component(devcom,
MLX5_DEVCOM_ESW_OFFLOADS,
mlx5_esw_offloads_devcom_event,
@@ -2761,6 +2761,9 @@ static void esw_offloads_devcom_cleanup(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
if (!MLX5_CAP_ESW(esw->dev, merged_eswitch))
return;
+ if (!mlx5_is_lag_supported(esw->dev))
+ return;
+
mlx5_devcom_send_event(devcom, MLX5_DEVCOM_ESW_OFFLOADS,
ESW_OFFLOADS_DEVCOM_UNPAIR, esw);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.h
index 72f70fad4641..c81b173156d2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.h
@@ -74,6 +74,16 @@ struct mlx5_lag {
struct lag_mpesw lag_mpesw;
};
+static inline bool mlx5_is_lag_supported(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
+{
+ if (!MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev, vport_group_manager) ||
+ !MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev, lag_master) ||
+ MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev, num_lag_ports) < 2 ||
+ MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev, num_lag_ports) > MLX5_MAX_PORTS)
+ return false;
+ return true;
+}
+
static inline struct mlx5_lag *
mlx5_lag_dev(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
{
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/mlx5_core.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/mlx5_core.h
index 484cb1e4fc7f..9cc7afea2758 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/mlx5_core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/mlx5_core.h
@@ -209,7 +209,6 @@ int mlx5_attach_device(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev);
void mlx5_detach_device(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev);
int mlx5_register_device(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev);
void mlx5_unregister_device(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev);
-struct mlx5_core_dev *mlx5_get_next_phys_dev(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev);
struct mlx5_core_dev *mlx5_get_next_phys_dev_lag(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev);
void mlx5_dev_list_lock(void);
void mlx5_dev_list_unlock(void);
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [net 5/6] net/mlx5: Rearm the FW tracer after each tracer event
2022-06-08 18:58 [pull request][net 0/6] mlx5 fixes 2022-06-08 Saeed Mahameed
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-08 18:58 ` [net 4/6] net/mlx5: E-Switch, pair only capable devices Saeed Mahameed
@ 2022-06-08 18:58 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-06-08 18:58 ` [net 6/6] net/mlx5: fs, fail conflicting actions Saeed Mahameed
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Saeed Mahameed @ 2022-06-08 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet
Cc: netdev, Feras Daoud, Roy Novich, Moshe Shemesh, Saeed Mahameed
From: Feras Daoud <ferasda@nvidia.com>
The current design does not arm the tracer if traces are available before
the tracer string database is fully loaded, leading to an unfunctional tracer.
This fix will rearm the tracer every time the FW triggers tracer event
regardless of the tracer strings database status.
Fixes: c71ad41ccb0c ("net/mlx5: FW tracer, events handling")
Signed-off-by: Feras Daoud <ferasda@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Roy Novich <royno@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/diag/fw_tracer.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/diag/fw_tracer.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/diag/fw_tracer.c
index eae9aa9c0811..978a2bb8e122 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/diag/fw_tracer.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/diag/fw_tracer.c
@@ -675,6 +675,9 @@ static void mlx5_fw_tracer_handle_traces(struct work_struct *work)
if (!tracer->owner)
return;
+ if (unlikely(!tracer->str_db.loaded))
+ goto arm;
+
block_count = tracer->buff.size / TRACER_BLOCK_SIZE_BYTE;
start_offset = tracer->buff.consumer_index * TRACER_BLOCK_SIZE_BYTE;
@@ -732,6 +735,7 @@ static void mlx5_fw_tracer_handle_traces(struct work_struct *work)
&tmp_trace_block[TRACES_PER_BLOCK - 1]);
}
+arm:
mlx5_fw_tracer_arm(dev);
}
@@ -1136,8 +1140,7 @@ static int fw_tracer_event(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action, void
queue_work(tracer->work_queue, &tracer->ownership_change_work);
break;
case MLX5_TRACER_SUBTYPE_TRACES_AVAILABLE:
- if (likely(tracer->str_db.loaded))
- queue_work(tracer->work_queue, &tracer->handle_traces_work);
+ queue_work(tracer->work_queue, &tracer->handle_traces_work);
break;
default:
mlx5_core_dbg(dev, "FWTracer: Event with unrecognized subtype: sub_type %d\n",
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [net 6/6] net/mlx5: fs, fail conflicting actions
2022-06-08 18:58 [pull request][net 0/6] mlx5 fixes 2022-06-08 Saeed Mahameed
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-08 18:58 ` [net 5/6] net/mlx5: Rearm the FW tracer after each tracer event Saeed Mahameed
@ 2022-06-08 18:58 ` Saeed Mahameed
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Saeed Mahameed @ 2022-06-08 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet
Cc: netdev, Mark Bloch, Maor Gottlieb, Saeed Mahameed
From: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
When combining two steering rules into one check
not only do they share the same actions but those
actions are also the same. This resolves an issue where
when creating two different rules with the same match
the actions are overwritten and one of the rules is deleted
a FW syndrome can be seen in dmesg.
mlx5_core 0000:03:00.0: mlx5_cmd_check:819:(pid 2105): DEALLOC_MODIFY_HEADER_CONTEXT(0x941) op_mod(0x0) failed, status bad resource state(0x9), syndrome (0x1ab444)
Fixes: 0d235c3fabb7 ("net/mlx5: Add hash table to search FTEs in a flow-group")
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c
index fdcf7f529330..21e5c709b2d3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c
@@ -1574,9 +1574,22 @@ static struct mlx5_flow_rule *find_flow_rule(struct fs_fte *fte,
return NULL;
}
-static bool check_conflicting_actions(u32 action1, u32 action2)
+static bool check_conflicting_actions_vlan(const struct mlx5_fs_vlan *vlan0,
+ const struct mlx5_fs_vlan *vlan1)
{
- u32 xored_actions = action1 ^ action2;
+ return vlan0->ethtype != vlan1->ethtype ||
+ vlan0->vid != vlan1->vid ||
+ vlan0->prio != vlan1->prio;
+}
+
+static bool check_conflicting_actions(const struct mlx5_flow_act *act1,
+ const struct mlx5_flow_act *act2)
+{
+ u32 action1 = act1->action;
+ u32 action2 = act2->action;
+ u32 xored_actions;
+
+ xored_actions = action1 ^ action2;
/* if one rule only wants to count, it's ok */
if (action1 == MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_COUNT ||
@@ -1593,6 +1606,22 @@ static bool check_conflicting_actions(u32 action1, u32 action2)
MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_VLAN_PUSH_2))
return true;
+ if (action1 & MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_PACKET_REFORMAT &&
+ act1->pkt_reformat != act2->pkt_reformat)
+ return true;
+
+ if (action1 & MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_MOD_HDR &&
+ act1->modify_hdr != act2->modify_hdr)
+ return true;
+
+ if (action1 & MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_VLAN_PUSH &&
+ check_conflicting_actions_vlan(&act1->vlan[0], &act2->vlan[0]))
+ return true;
+
+ if (action1 & MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_VLAN_PUSH_2 &&
+ check_conflicting_actions_vlan(&act1->vlan[1], &act2->vlan[1]))
+ return true;
+
return false;
}
@@ -1600,7 +1629,7 @@ static int check_conflicting_ftes(struct fs_fte *fte,
const struct mlx5_flow_context *flow_context,
const struct mlx5_flow_act *flow_act)
{
- if (check_conflicting_actions(flow_act->action, fte->action.action)) {
+ if (check_conflicting_actions(flow_act, &fte->action)) {
mlx5_core_warn(get_dev(&fte->node),
"Found two FTEs with conflicting actions\n");
return -EEXIST;
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread