From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next v2 12/15] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: separate phylink mode from switch register
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 11:24:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220614082429.x2ger7aysr4j4zbo@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220530104257.21485-13-arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 04:12:54PM +0530, Arun Ramadoss wrote:
> As per 'commit 3506b2f42dff ("net: dsa: microchip: call
> phy_remove_link_mode during probe")' phy_remove_link_mode is added in
> the switch_register function after dsa_switch_register. In order to have
> the common switch register function, moving this phy init after
> dsa_register_switch using the new ksz_dev_ops.dsa_init hook.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c | 49 ++++++++++++++------------
> drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c | 5 ++-
> drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c
> index ecce99b77ef6..c87ce0e2afd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c
> @@ -1349,6 +1349,30 @@ static void ksz9477_switch_exit(struct ksz_device *dev)
> ksz9477_reset_switch(dev);
> }
>
> +static int ksz9477_dsa_init(struct ksz_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct phy_device *phydev;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < dev->phy_port_cnt; ++i) {
> + if (!dsa_is_user_port(dev->ds, i))
> + continue;
I understand this is just code movement, but this is more efficient:
struct dsa_switch *ds = dev->ds;
struct dsa_port *dp;
dsa_switch_for_each_user_port(dp, ds) {
...
}
> +
> + phydev = dsa_to_port(dev->ds, i)->slave->phydev;
> +
> + /* The MAC actually cannot run in 1000 half-duplex mode. */
> + phy_remove_link_mode(phydev,
> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Half_BIT);
> +
> + /* PHY does not support gigabit. */
> + if (!(dev->features & GBIT_SUPPORT))
> + phy_remove_link_mode(phydev,
> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT);
> + }
I wonder why the driver did not just remove these from the supported
mask in the phylink validation procedure in the first place?
Adding these link mode fixups to a dev_ops callback named "dsa_init"
does not sound quite right.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct ksz_dev_ops ksz9477_dev_ops = {
> .setup = ksz9477_setup,
> .get_port_addr = ksz9477_get_port_addr,
> @@ -1377,35 +1401,14 @@ static const struct ksz_dev_ops ksz9477_dev_ops = {
> .change_mtu = ksz9477_change_mtu,
> .max_mtu = ksz9477_max_mtu,
> .shutdown = ksz9477_reset_switch,
> + .dsa_init = ksz9477_dsa_init,
> .init = ksz9477_switch_init,
> .exit = ksz9477_switch_exit,
> };
>
> int ksz9477_switch_register(struct ksz_device *dev)
> {
> - int ret, i;
> - struct phy_device *phydev;
> -
> - ret = ksz_switch_register(dev, &ksz9477_dev_ops);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < dev->phy_port_cnt; ++i) {
> - if (!dsa_is_user_port(dev->ds, i))
> - continue;
> -
> - phydev = dsa_to_port(dev->ds, i)->slave->phydev;
> -
> - /* The MAC actually cannot run in 1000 half-duplex mode. */
> - phy_remove_link_mode(phydev,
> - ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Half_BIT);
> -
> - /* PHY does not support gigabit. */
> - if (!(dev->features & GBIT_SUPPORT))
> - phy_remove_link_mode(phydev,
> - ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT);
> - }
> - return ret;
> + return ksz_switch_register(dev, &ksz9477_dev_ops);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ksz9477_switch_register);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> index ace5cf0ad5a8..f40d64858d35 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> @@ -1253,7 +1253,10 @@ int ksz_switch_register(struct ksz_device *dev,
> /* Start the MIB timer. */
> schedule_delayed_work(&dev->mib_read, 0);
>
> - return 0;
> + if (dev->dev_ops->dsa_init)
> + ret = dev->dev_ops->dsa_init(dev);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ksz_switch_register);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.h b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.h
> index 872d378ac45c..23962f47df46 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.h
> @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ struct ksz_dev_ops {
> void (*freeze_mib)(struct ksz_device *dev, int port, bool freeze);
> void (*port_init_cnt)(struct ksz_device *dev, int port);
> int (*shutdown)(struct ksz_device *dev);
> + int (*dsa_init)(struct ksz_device *dev);
> int (*init)(struct ksz_device *dev);
> void (*exit)(struct ksz_device *dev);
> };
> --
> 2.36.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-14 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-30 10:42 [RFC Patch net-next v2 00/15] net: dsa: microchip: common spi probe for the ksz series switches Arun Ramadoss
2022-05-30 10:42 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 01/15] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: cleanup the ksz9477_switch_detect Arun Ramadoss
2022-06-12 14:20 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-30 10:42 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 02/15] net: dsa: microchip: move switch chip_id detection to ksz_common Arun Ramadoss
2022-06-13 9:18 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-06-14 7:10 ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-05-30 10:42 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 03/15] net: dsa: microchip: move tag_protocol & phy read/write " Arun Ramadoss
2022-06-13 9:22 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-06-15 6:36 ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-05-30 10:42 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 04/15] net: dsa: microchip: move vlan functionality " Arun Ramadoss
2022-06-13 9:24 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-30 10:42 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 05/15] net: dsa: microchip: move the port mirror " Arun Ramadoss
2022-06-13 9:28 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-06-15 6:40 ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-05-30 10:42 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 06/15] net: dsa: microchip: get P_STP_CTRL in ksz_port_stp_state by ksz_dev_ops Arun Ramadoss
2022-06-13 9:31 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-06-15 6:49 ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-05-30 10:42 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 07/15] net: dsa: microchip: update the ksz_phylink_get_caps Arun Ramadoss
2022-06-13 9:32 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-30 10:42 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 08/15] net: dsa: microchip: update the ksz_port_mdb_add/del Arun Ramadoss
2022-06-13 9:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-30 10:42 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 09/15] net: dsa: microchip: update fdb add/del/dump in ksz_common Arun Ramadoss
2022-06-13 9:42 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-06-15 6:57 ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-05-30 10:42 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 10/15] net: dsa: microchip: move the setup, get_phy_flags & mtu to ksz_common Arun Ramadoss
2022-06-14 8:15 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-06-15 8:36 ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-05-30 10:42 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 11/15] net: dsa: microchip: common dsa_switch_ops for ksz switches Arun Ramadoss
2022-05-30 10:42 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 12/15] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: separate phylink mode from switch register Arun Ramadoss
2022-06-14 8:24 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2022-06-15 8:49 ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-06-15 11:14 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-05-30 10:42 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 13/15] net: dsa: microchip: common menuconfig for ksz series switch Arun Ramadoss
2022-05-30 10:42 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 14/15] net: dsa: microchip: move ksz_dev_ops to ksz_common.c Arun Ramadoss
2022-05-30 10:42 ` [RFC Patch net-next v2 15/15] net: dsa: microchip: common ksz_spi_probe for ksz switches Arun Ramadoss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220614082429.x2ger7aysr4j4zbo@skbuf \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arun.ramadoss@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).