netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: mka@chromium.org, evgreen@chromium.org,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, quic_cpratapa@quicinc.com,
	quic_avuyyuru@quicinc.com, quic_jponduru@quicinc.com,
	quic_subashab@quicinc.com, elder@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: ipa: move more code out of gsi_channel_update()
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:59:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220615165929.5924-6-elder@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220615165929.5924-1-elder@linaro.org>

Move the processing done for TX channels in gsi_channel_update()
into gsi_evt_ring_rx_update().  The called function is called for
both RX and TX channels, so rename it to be gsi_evt_ring_update().
As a result, this code no longer assumes events in an event ring are
associated with just one channel.

Because all events in a ring are handled in that function, we can
move the call to gsi_trans_move_complete() there, and can ring the
event ring doorbell there as well after all new events in the ring
have been processed.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/net/ipa/gsi.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ipa/gsi.c b/drivers/net/ipa/gsi.c
index d08f3e73d51fc..4e46974a69ecd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ipa/gsi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ipa/gsi.c
@@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ gsi_event_trans(struct gsi *gsi, struct gsi_event *event)
 }
 
 /**
- * gsi_evt_ring_rx_update() - Record lengths of received data
+ * gsi_evt_ring_update() - Update transaction state from hardware
  * @gsi:		GSI pointer
  * @evt_ring_id:	Event ring ID
  * @index:		Event index in ring reported by hardware
@@ -1353,6 +1353,10 @@ gsi_event_trans(struct gsi *gsi, struct gsi_event *event)
  * the buffer.  Every event has a transaction associated with it, and here
  * we update transactions to record their actual received lengths.
  *
+ * When an event for a TX channel arrives we use information in the
+ * transaction to report the number of requests and bytes have been
+ * transferred.
+ *
  * This function is called whenever we learn that the GSI hardware has filled
  * new events since the last time we checked.  The ring's index field tells
  * the first entry in need of processing.  The index provided is the
@@ -1363,7 +1367,7 @@ gsi_event_trans(struct gsi *gsi, struct gsi_event *event)
  *
  * Note that @index always refers to an element *within* the event ring.
  */
-static void gsi_evt_ring_rx_update(struct gsi *gsi, u32 evt_ring_id, u32 index)
+static void gsi_evt_ring_update(struct gsi *gsi, u32 evt_ring_id, u32 index)
 {
 	struct gsi_evt_ring *evt_ring = &gsi->evt_ring[evt_ring_id];
 	struct gsi_ring *ring = &evt_ring->ring;
@@ -1372,10 +1376,12 @@ static void gsi_evt_ring_rx_update(struct gsi *gsi, u32 evt_ring_id, u32 index)
 	u32 event_avail;
 	u32 old_index;
 
-	/* We'll start with the oldest un-processed event.  RX channels
-	 * replenish receive buffers in single-TRE transactions, so we
-	 * can just map that event to its transaction.  Transactions
-	 * associated with completion events are consecutive.
+	/* Starting with the oldest un-processed event, determine which
+	 * transaction (and which channel) is associated with the event.
+	 * For RX channels, update each completed transaction with the
+	 * number of bytes that were actually received.  For TX channels
+	 * associated with a network device, report to the network stack
+	 * the number of transfers and bytes this completion represents.
 	 */
 	old_index = ring->index;
 	event = gsi_ring_virt(ring, old_index);
@@ -1394,6 +1400,10 @@ static void gsi_evt_ring_rx_update(struct gsi *gsi, u32 evt_ring_id, u32 index)
 
 		if (trans->direction == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
 			trans->len = __le16_to_cpu(event->len);
+		else
+			gsi_trans_tx_completed(trans);
+
+		gsi_trans_move_complete(trans);
 
 		/* Move on to the next event and transaction */
 		if (--event_avail)
@@ -1401,6 +1411,9 @@ static void gsi_evt_ring_rx_update(struct gsi *gsi, u32 evt_ring_id, u32 index)
 		else
 			event = gsi_ring_virt(ring, 0);
 	} while (event != event_done);
+
+	/* Tell the hardware we've handled these events */
+	gsi_evt_ring_doorbell(gsi, evt_ring_id, index);
 }
 
 /* Initialize a ring, including allocating DMA memory for its entries */
@@ -1499,14 +1512,7 @@ static struct gsi_trans *gsi_channel_update(struct gsi_channel *channel)
 	 * the number of transactions and bytes this completion represents
 	 * up the network stack.
 	 */
-	if (channel->toward_ipa)
-		gsi_trans_tx_completed(trans);
-	gsi_evt_ring_rx_update(gsi, evt_ring_id, index);
-
-	gsi_trans_move_complete(trans);
-
-	/* Tell the hardware we've handled these events */
-	gsi_evt_ring_doorbell(gsi, evt_ring_id, index);
+	gsi_evt_ring_update(gsi, evt_ring_id, index);
 
 	return gsi_channel_trans_complete(channel);
 }
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-15 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-15 16:59 [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: ipa: more multi-channel event ring work Alex Elder
2022-06-15 16:59 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: ipa: don't assume one channel per event ring Alex Elder
2022-06-15 16:59 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: ipa: don't pass channel when mapping transaction Alex Elder
2022-06-15 16:59 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: ipa: pass GSI pointer to gsi_evt_ring_rx_update() Alex Elder
2022-06-15 16:59 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: ipa: call gsi_evt_ring_rx_update() unconditionally Alex Elder
2022-06-15 16:59 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2022-06-17  3:50 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: ipa: more multi-channel event ring work patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220615165929.5924-6-elder@linaro.org \
    --to=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_avuyyuru@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_cpratapa@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_jponduru@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_subashab@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).