From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@redhat.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@gmail.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] veth: Add updating of trans_start
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 12:44:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220617124413.6848c826@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5765.1655484175@famine>
On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:42:55 -0700 Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> In this case, it's to permit the bonding ARP / ND monitor to
> function if that software device (veth in this case) is added to a bond
> using the ARP / ND monitor (which relies on trans_start, and has done so
> since at least 2.6.0). I'll agree it's a niche case; this was broken
> for veth for quite some time, but veth + netns is handy for software
> only test cases, so it seems worth doing.
I presume it needs it to check if the device has transmitted anything
in the last unit of time, can we look at the device stats for LLTX for
example?
> I didn't exhaustively check all LLTX drivers, but, e.g., tun
> does update trans_start:
>
> drivers/net/tun.c:
>
> /* NETIF_F_LLTX requires to do our own update of trans_start */
> queue = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, txq);
> txq_trans_cond_update(queue);
Well, it is _an_ example, but the only one I can find. And the
justification is the same as yours now -- make bonding work a31d27fb.
Because of that I don't think we can use tun as a proof that trans
start should be updated on LLTX devices as a general, stack-wide rule.
There's a lot more LLTX devices than veth and tun.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-17 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-16 19:26 [PATCH net] veth: Add updating of trans_start Jay Vosburgh
2022-06-17 10:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2022-06-17 15:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-17 16:42 ` Jay Vosburgh
2022-06-17 19:44 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-06-18 0:27 ` Jay Vosburgh
2022-06-18 0:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-21 19:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-22 1:42 ` Jay Vosburgh
2022-06-22 4:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220617124413.6848c826@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=jtoppins@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).