From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, jakub@cloudflare.com,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, dsahern@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com,
songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
borisp@nvidia.com, cong.wang@bytedance.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 2/2] sock: redo the psock vs ULP protection check
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 12:13:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220620191353.1184629-2-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220620191353.1184629-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Commit 8a59f9d1e3d4 ("sock: Introduce sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot()")
has moved the inet_csk_has_ulp(sk) check from sk_psock_init() to
the new tcp_bpf_update_proto() function. I'm guessing that this
was done to allow creating psocks for non-inet sockets.
Unfortunately the destruction path for psock includes the ULP
unwind, so we need to fail the sk_psock_init() itself.
Otherwise if ULP is already present we'll notice that later,
and call tcp_update_ulp() with the sk_proto of the ULP
itself, which will most likely result in the ULP looping
its callbacks.
Fixes: 8a59f9d1e3d4 ("sock: Introduce sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot()")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
CC: john.fastabend@gmail.com
CC: jakub@cloudflare.com
CC: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
CC: dsahern@kernel.org
CC: ast@kernel.org
CC: daniel@iogearbox.net
CC: andrii@kernel.org
CC: kafai@fb.com
CC: songliubraving@fb.com
CC: yhs@fb.com
CC: kpsingh@kernel.org
CC: borisp@nvidia.com
CC: cong.wang@bytedance.com
CC: bpf@vger.kernel.org
---
include/net/inet_sock.h | 5 +++++
net/core/skmsg.c | 5 +++++
net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c | 3 ---
net/tls/tls_main.c | 2 ++
4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/inet_sock.h b/include/net/inet_sock.h
index c1b5dcd6597c..daead5fb389a 100644
--- a/include/net/inet_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_sock.h
@@ -253,6 +253,11 @@ struct inet_sock {
#define IP_CMSG_CHECKSUM BIT(7)
#define IP_CMSG_RECVFRAGSIZE BIT(8)
+static inline bool sk_is_inet(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ return sk->sk_family == AF_INET || sk->sk_family == AF_INET6;
+}
+
/**
* sk_to_full_sk - Access to a full socket
* @sk: pointer to a socket
diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
index 22b983ade0e7..b0fcd0200e84 100644
--- a/net/core/skmsg.c
+++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
@@ -699,6 +699,11 @@ struct sk_psock *sk_psock_init(struct sock *sk, int node)
write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
+ if (sk_is_inet(sk) && inet_csk_has_ulp(sk)) {
+ psock = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
if (sk->sk_user_data) {
psock = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
goto out;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
index be3947e70fec..0d3f68bb51c0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
@@ -611,9 +611,6 @@ int tcp_bpf_update_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, bool restore)
return 0;
}
- if (inet_csk_has_ulp(sk))
- return -EINVAL;
-
if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6) {
if (tcp_bpf_assert_proto_ops(psock->sk_proto))
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c
index da176411c1b5..2ffede463e4a 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_main.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c
@@ -921,6 +921,8 @@ static void tls_update(struct sock *sk, struct proto *p,
{
struct tls_context *ctx;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(sk->sk_prot == p);
+
ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
if (likely(ctx)) {
ctx->sk_write_space = write_space;
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-20 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-20 19:13 [PATCH net 1/2] Revert "net/tls: fix tls_sk_proto_close executed repeatedly" Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-20 19:13 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-06-22 14:00 ` [PATCH net 2/2] sock: redo the psock vs ULP protection check John Fastabend
2022-06-22 17:24 ` [PATCH net] selftests/bpf: Test sockmap update when socket has ULP Jakub Sitnicki
2022-06-23 5:42 ` John Fastabend
2022-06-23 9:12 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2022-06-22 17:24 ` [PATCH net 2/2] sock: redo the psock vs ULP protection check Jakub Sitnicki
2022-06-22 22:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-23 9:12 ` [PATCH net v2] selftests/bpf: Test sockmap update when socket has ULP Jakub Sitnicki
2022-06-24 18:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2022-06-22 14:00 ` [PATCH net 1/2] Revert "net/tls: fix tls_sk_proto_close executed repeatedly" John Fastabend
2022-06-23 8:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220620191353.1184629-2-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).