From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Lior Nahmanson <liorna@nvidia.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
Ben Ben Ishay <benishay@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net/macsec: Add MACsec skb extension Rx Data path support
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:26:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220621122641.3cba3d38@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR12MB5449F670E890436B0C454D2ABFB39@PH0PR12MB5449.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:39:23 +0000 Lior Nahmanson wrote:
> > Shooting from the hip a little bit, but macsec being a tightly bound L2 upper
> > maybe metadata dst is a workable solution for carrying the sci and offload
> > status between upper and lower? The range of values should be well known
> > and limited.
>
> Under the assumption that by skb_metadata you meant metadata_dst,
Can you show me in my email where I said skb_metadata?
> I think there are few reasons why i think is better to use skb extensions:
>
> 1. Unlike skb extension, the metadata_dst deallaction is handled directly by the allocator.
> Since the sci and offloaded fields are shared between the MACsec driver and the offload driver
> (in our case mlx5 driver), for Rx, the metadata_dst allocation is done in the mlx5 driver,
> while the dealloction should be done in the MACsec driver.
> This is undesired behavior.
You allocate metadata skb once and then attach it to the skbs.
> 2. medadata_dst is attached to the skb using skb_dst_set(), which set the slow_gro bit.
> So there is no gain regarding slow_gro flow.
>
> 3. metadata_dst allocation require much more memory than needed for MACsec use case
> (mainly because struct dst_entry which seems redundant for this case).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-21 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-13 11:19 [PATCH net-next v3 00/3] Introduce MACsec offload SKB extension Lior Nahmanson
2022-06-13 11:19 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] net/macsec: Add MACsec skb extension Tx Data path support Lior Nahmanson
2022-06-13 11:19 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net/macsec: Add MACsec skb extension Rx " Lior Nahmanson
2022-06-14 13:55 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-06-14 16:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-21 12:39 ` Lior Nahmanson
2022-06-21 19:26 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-07-12 6:50 ` Lior Nahmanson
2022-07-13 0:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-13 6:21 ` Lior Nahmanson
2022-07-13 18:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-13 19:31 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-06-13 11:19 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] net/macsec: Move some code for sharing with various drivers that implements offload Lior Nahmanson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220621122641.3cba3d38@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=benishay@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=liorna@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=raeds@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).