From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 03/19] ipmr: change igmpmsg_netlink_event() prototype
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 05:12:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220622051255.700309-4-edumazet@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220622051255.700309-1-edumazet@google.com>
igmpmsg_netlink_event() first argument can be marked const.
igmpmsg_netlink_event() reads mrt->net and mrt->id,
both being set once in mr_table_alloc().
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
index 10371a9e78fc41e8562fa8d81222a8ae24e2fbb6..6710324497cae3bbc2fcdd12d6e1d44eed5215b3 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static int ipmr_cache_report(struct mr_table *mrt,
struct sk_buff *pkt, vifi_t vifi, int assert);
static void mroute_netlink_event(struct mr_table *mrt, struct mfc_cache *mfc,
int cmd);
-static void igmpmsg_netlink_event(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt);
+static void igmpmsg_netlink_event(const struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt);
static void mroute_clean_tables(struct mr_table *mrt, int flags);
static void ipmr_expire_process(struct timer_list *t);
@@ -2410,7 +2410,7 @@ static size_t igmpmsg_netlink_msgsize(size_t payloadlen)
return len;
}
-static void igmpmsg_netlink_event(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt)
+static void igmpmsg_netlink_event(const struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt)
{
struct net *net = read_pnet(&mrt->net);
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
--
2.37.0.rc0.104.g0611611a94-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-22 5:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-22 5:12 [PATCH net-next 00/19] ipmr: get rid of rwlocks Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 01/19] ip6mr: do not get a device reference in pim6_rcv() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 02/19] ipmr: add rcu protection over (struct vif_device)->dev Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 04/19] ipmr: ipmr_cache_report() changes Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 05/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock in __pim_rcv() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 06/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock in ioctl(SIOCGETVIFCNT) Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 07/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock before calling ipmr_cache_unresolved() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 08/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock while calling ip_mr_forward() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 09/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock in ipmr_get_route() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 10/19] ip6mr: ip6mr_cache_report() changes Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 11/19] ip6mr: do not acquire mrt_lock in pim6_rcv() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 12/19] ip6mr: do not acquire mrt_lock in ioctl(SIOCGETMIFCNT_IN6) Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 13/19] ip6mr: do not acquire mrt_lock before calling ip6mr_cache_unresolved Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 14/19] ip6mr: do not acquire mrt_lock while calling ip6_mr_forward() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 15/19] ip6mr: switch ip6mr_get_route() to rcu_read_lock() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 16/19] ipmr: adopt rcu_read_lock() in mr_dump() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 17/19] ipmr: conver /proc handlers to rcu_read_lock() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 5:12 ` [PATCH net-next 18/19] ipmr: convert mrt_lock to a spinlock Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23 0:34 ` [PATCH net-next 00/19] ipmr: get rid of rwlocks Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220622051255.700309-4-edumazet@google.com \
--to=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).