From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Ismael Luceno <iluceno@suse.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Netlink NLM_F_DUMP_INTR flag lost
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 16:55:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220622165547.71846773@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220622131218.1ed6f531@pirotess>
On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:18 +0200 Ismael Luceno wrote:
> So, just for clarification:
>
> Scenario 1:
> - 64 KB packet is filled.
> - protocol table shrinks
> - Next iteration finds it's done
> - next protocol clears the seq, so nothing is flaged
> - ...
> - NLMSG_DONE (not flagged)
>
> Scenario 2:
> - 64 KB packet is filled.
> - protocol table shrinks
> - Next iteration finds it's done
> - NLMSG_DONE (flagged with NLM_F_DUMP_INTR)
>
> So, in order to break as little as possible, I was thinking about
> introducing a new packet iff it happens we have to signal INTR between
> protocols.
>
> Does that sound good?
Right, the question is what message can we introduce here which would
not break old user space?
The alternative of not wiping the _DUMP_INTR flag as we move thru
protocols seems more and more appealing, even tho I was initially
dismissive.
We should make sure we do one last consistency check before we return 0
from the handlers. Or even at the end of the loop in rtnl_dump_all().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-22 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220615171113.7d93af3e@pirotess>
2022-06-15 16:00 ` Netlink NLM_F_DUMP_INTR flag lost Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-16 15:10 ` Ismael Luceno
2022-06-17 0:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-17 13:01 ` Ismael Luceno
2022-06-17 14:55 ` David Ahern
2022-06-17 15:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-17 16:17 ` David Ahern
2022-06-17 16:28 ` David Ahern
2022-08-24 10:59 ` Ismael Luceno
2022-08-24 11:46 ` Florian Westphal
2022-06-22 11:12 ` Ismael Luceno
2022-06-22 23:55 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-06-23 4:01 ` David Ahern
2022-06-23 16:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-23 16:17 ` David Ahern
2022-06-23 16:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-23 17:31 ` David Ahern
2022-06-23 19:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-28 19:38 ` Ismael Luceno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220622165547.71846773@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=iluceno@suse.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).