netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 10/19] ip6mr: ip6mr_cache_report() changes
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 04:34:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220623043449.1217288-11-edumazet@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220623043449.1217288-1-edumazet@google.com>

ip6mr_cache_report() first argument can be marked const, and we change
the caller convention about which lock needs to be held.

Instead of read_lock(&mrt_lock), we can use rcu_read_lock().

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
 net/ipv6/ip6mr.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6mr.c b/net/ipv6/ip6mr.c
index 44cb3d88bbd6f85ce0c8e9054dd3d578b7b3733b..a6d97952bf5306c245996c612107d0c851bbc822 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6mr.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6mr.c
@@ -91,11 +91,11 @@ static void ip6mr_free_table(struct mr_table *mrt);
 static void ip6_mr_forward(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
 			   struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
 			   struct mfc6_cache *cache);
-static int ip6mr_cache_report(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt,
+static int ip6mr_cache_report(const struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt,
 			      mifi_t mifi, int assert);
 static void mr6_netlink_event(struct mr_table *mrt, struct mfc6_cache *mfc,
 			      int cmd);
-static void mrt6msg_netlink_event(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt);
+static void mrt6msg_netlink_event(const struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt);
 static int ip6mr_rtm_dumproute(struct sk_buff *skb,
 			       struct netlink_callback *cb);
 static void mroute_clean_tables(struct mr_table *mrt, int flags);
@@ -608,11 +608,12 @@ static netdev_tx_t reg_vif_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (ip6mr_fib_lookup(net, &fl6, &mrt) < 0)
 		goto tx_err;
 
-	read_lock(&mrt_lock);
 	dev->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
 	dev->stats.tx_packets++;
-	ip6mr_cache_report(mrt, skb, mrt->mroute_reg_vif_num, MRT6MSG_WHOLEPKT);
-	read_unlock(&mrt_lock);
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	ip6mr_cache_report(mrt, skb, READ_ONCE(mrt->mroute_reg_vif_num),
+			   MRT6MSG_WHOLEPKT);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	kfree_skb(skb);
 	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
 
@@ -718,8 +719,10 @@ static int mif6_delete(struct mr_table *mrt, int vifi, int notify,
 	RCU_INIT_POINTER(v->dev, NULL);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_PIMSM_V2
-	if (vifi == mrt->mroute_reg_vif_num)
-		mrt->mroute_reg_vif_num = -1;
+	if (vifi == mrt->mroute_reg_vif_num) {
+		/* Pairs with READ_ONCE() in ip6mr_cache_report() and reg_vif_xmit() */
+		WRITE_ONCE(mrt->mroute_reg_vif_num, -1);
+	}
 #endif
 
 	if (vifi + 1 == mrt->maxvif) {
@@ -922,7 +925,7 @@ static int mif6_add(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
 	netdev_tracker_alloc(dev, &v->dev_tracker, GFP_ATOMIC);
 #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_PIMSM_V2
 	if (v->flags & MIFF_REGISTER)
-		mrt->mroute_reg_vif_num = vifi;
+		WRITE_ONCE(mrt->mroute_reg_vif_num, vifi);
 #endif
 	if (vifi + 1 > mrt->maxvif)
 		mrt->maxvif = vifi + 1;
@@ -1033,10 +1036,10 @@ static void ip6mr_cache_resolve(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
 /*
  *	Bounce a cache query up to pim6sd and netlink.
  *
- *	Called under mrt_lock.
+ *	Called under rcu_read_lock()
  */
 
-static int ip6mr_cache_report(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt,
+static int ip6mr_cache_report(const struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt,
 			      mifi_t mifi, int assert)
 {
 	struct sock *mroute6_sk;
@@ -1077,7 +1080,7 @@ static int ip6mr_cache_report(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt,
 		if (assert == MRT6MSG_WRMIFWHOLE)
 			msg->im6_mif = mifi;
 		else
-			msg->im6_mif = mrt->mroute_reg_vif_num;
+			msg->im6_mif = READ_ONCE(mrt->mroute_reg_vif_num);
 		msg->im6_pad = 0;
 		msg->im6_src = ipv6_hdr(pkt)->saddr;
 		msg->im6_dst = ipv6_hdr(pkt)->daddr;
@@ -1112,10 +1115,8 @@ static int ip6mr_cache_report(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt,
 	skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
 	}
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	mroute6_sk = rcu_dereference(mrt->mroute_sk);
 	if (!mroute6_sk) {
-		rcu_read_unlock();
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -1124,7 +1125,7 @@ static int ip6mr_cache_report(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt,
 
 	/* Deliver to user space multicast routing algorithms */
 	ret = sock_queue_rcv_skb(mroute6_sk, skb);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		net_warn_ratelimited("mroute6: pending queue full, dropping entries\n");
 		kfree_skb(skb);
@@ -2042,7 +2043,9 @@ static int ip6mr_forward2(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
 		vif->bytes_out += skb->len;
 		vif_dev->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
 		vif_dev->stats.tx_packets++;
+		rcu_read_lock();
 		ip6mr_cache_report(mrt, skb, vifi, MRT6MSG_WHOLEPKT);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		goto out_free;
 	}
 #endif
@@ -2155,10 +2158,12 @@ static void ip6_mr_forward(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
 			       c->_c.mfc_un.res.last_assert +
 			       MFC_ASSERT_THRESH)) {
 			c->_c.mfc_un.res.last_assert = jiffies;
+			rcu_read_lock();
 			ip6mr_cache_report(mrt, skb, true_vifi, MRT6MSG_WRONGMIF);
 			if (mrt->mroute_do_wrvifwhole)
 				ip6mr_cache_report(mrt, skb, true_vifi,
 						   MRT6MSG_WRMIFWHOLE);
+			rcu_read_unlock();
 		}
 		goto dont_forward;
 	}
@@ -2465,7 +2470,7 @@ static size_t mrt6msg_netlink_msgsize(size_t payloadlen)
 	return len;
 }
 
-static void mrt6msg_netlink_event(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt)
+static void mrt6msg_netlink_event(const struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *pkt)
 {
 	struct net *net = read_pnet(&mrt->net);
 	struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
-- 
2.37.0.rc0.104.g0611611a94-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-23  4:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-23  4:34 [PATCH v2 net-next 00/19] ipmr: get rid of rwlocks Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 01/19] ip6mr: do not get a device reference in pim6_rcv() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 02/19] ipmr: add rcu protection over (struct vif_device)->dev Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 03/19] ipmr: change igmpmsg_netlink_event() prototype Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 04/19] ipmr: ipmr_cache_report() changes Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 05/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock in __pim_rcv() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 06/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock in ioctl(SIOCGETVIFCNT) Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 07/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock before calling ipmr_cache_unresolved() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 08/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock while calling ip_mr_forward() Eric Dumazet
2022-07-22 19:34   ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-22 20:37     ` Eric Dumazet
2022-07-22 21:10       ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-22 21:15         ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 09/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock in ipmr_get_route() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 11/19] ip6mr: do not acquire mrt_lock in pim6_rcv() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 12/19] ip6mr: do not acquire mrt_lock in ioctl(SIOCGETMIFCNT_IN6) Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 13/19] ip6mr: do not acquire mrt_lock before calling ip6mr_cache_unresolved Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 14/19] ip6mr: do not acquire mrt_lock while calling ip6_mr_forward() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 15/19] ip6mr: switch ip6mr_get_route() to rcu_read_lock() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 16/19] ipmr: adopt rcu_read_lock() in mr_dump() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 17/19] ipmr: convert /proc handlers to rcu_read_lock() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 18/19] ipmr: convert mrt_lock to a spinlock Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 19/19] ip6mr: " Eric Dumazet
2022-06-24 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 00/19] ipmr: get rid of rwlocks patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220623043449.1217288-11-edumazet@google.com \
    --to=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).