From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Piotr Skajewski <piotrx.skajewski@intel.com>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, konrad0.jankowski@intel.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] ixgbe: Add locking to prevent panic when setting sriov_numvfs to zero
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 08:11:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220630081134.48b9bb53@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220630100839.14079-1-piotrx.skajewski@intel.com>
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:08:39 +0200 Piotr Skajewski wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 10:27:07 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 09:53:46 -0700 Tony Nguyen wrote:
> > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->vfs_lock, flags);
> > > +
> > > /* set num VFs to 0 to prevent access to vfinfo */
> > > adapter->num_vfs = 0;
> > >
> > > @@ -228,6 +231,8 @@ int ixgbe_disable_sriov(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
> > > kfree(adapter->mv_list);
> > > adapter->mv_list = NULL;
> > >
> > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->vfs_lock, flags);
> >
> > There's a pci_dev_put() in there, are you sure it won't sleep?
>
> Thank Jakub for your notice, during development we were aware about this
> and tests we've made on this particular case, did not report any problems
> that could be related to might_sleep in conjunction with spinlock.
To be on the safe side how about we protect adapter->num_vfs instead
of adapter->vfinfo ?
You can hold the lock just around setting adapter->num_vfs to zero,
and then inside ixgbe_msg_task() you don't have to add the new if()
because the loop bound is already adapter->num_vfs.
Smaller change, and safer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-30 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-28 16:53 [PATCH net 1/1] ixgbe: Add locking to prevent panic when setting sriov_numvfs to zero Tony Nguyen
2022-06-28 17:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-30 10:08 ` Piotr Skajewski
2022-06-30 15:11 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-07-01 8:31 ` Piotr Skajewski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-08-12 17:18 Tony Nguyen
2021-08-14 0:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-08-16 17:52 ` Nguyen, Anthony L
2021-08-17 10:23 ` Ken Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220630081134.48b9bb53@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=konrad0.jankowski@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=piotrx.skajewski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).