From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@gmail.com>, jmaloy@redhat.com, ying.xue@windriver.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: tipc: fix possible infoleak in tipc_mon_rcv()
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 08:27:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220630082718.7df33430@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <665de056-6ec1-e4e1-adf9-4df3e35628b7@gmail.com>
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 17:19:21 +0800 Hangyu Hua wrote:
> On 2022/6/30 11:31, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 16:31:22 +0800 Hangyu Hua wrote:
> >> dom_bef is use to cache current domain record only if current domain
> >> exists. But when current domain does not exist, dom_bef will still be used
> >> in mon_identify_lost_members. This may lead to an information leak.
> >
> > AFAICT applied_bef must be zero if peer->domain was 0, so I don't think
> > mon_identify_lost_members() will do anything.
> >
>
> void tipc_mon_rcv(struct net *net, void *data, u16 dlen, u32 addr,
> struct tipc_mon_state *state, int bearer_id)
> {
> ...
> if (!dom || (dom->len < new_dlen)) {
> kfree(dom);
> dom = kmalloc(new_dlen, GFP_ATOMIC); <--- [1]
> peer->domain = dom;
> if (!dom)
> goto exit;
> }
> ...
> }
>
> peer->domain will be NULL when [1] fails. But there will not change
> peer->applied to 0. In this case, if tipc_mon_rcv is called again then
> an information leak will happen.
I see, good analysis! Jon, Xue - is there a reason domain gets wiped
on memory allocation failure? I'd think we should leave the previous
pointer in place instead of freeing it first.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-30 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-28 8:31 [PATCH v2] net: tipc: fix possible infoleak in tipc_mon_rcv() Hangyu Hua
2022-06-28 10:28 ` Tung Quang Nguyen
2022-06-30 3:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-30 9:19 ` Hangyu Hua
2022-06-30 15:27 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220630082718.7df33430@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hbh25y@gmail.com \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au \
--cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).