netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@gmail.com>, jmaloy@redhat.com, ying.xue@windriver.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: tipc: fix possible infoleak in tipc_mon_rcv()
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 08:27:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220630082718.7df33430@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <665de056-6ec1-e4e1-adf9-4df3e35628b7@gmail.com>

On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 17:19:21 +0800 Hangyu Hua wrote:
> On 2022/6/30 11:31, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 16:31:22 +0800 Hangyu Hua wrote:  
> >> dom_bef is use to cache current domain record only if current domain
> >> exists. But when current domain does not exist, dom_bef will still be used
> >> in mon_identify_lost_members. This may lead to an information leak.  
> > 
> > AFAICT applied_bef must be zero if peer->domain was 0, so I don't think
> > mon_identify_lost_members() will do anything.
> >   
> 
> void tipc_mon_rcv(struct net *net, void *data, u16 dlen, u32 addr,
> 		  struct tipc_mon_state *state, int bearer_id)
> {
> ...
> 	if (!dom || (dom->len < new_dlen)) {
> 		kfree(dom);
> 		dom = kmalloc(new_dlen, GFP_ATOMIC);	<--- [1]
> 		peer->domain = dom;
> 		if (!dom)
> 			goto exit;
> 	}
> ...
> }
> 
> peer->domain will be NULL when [1] fails. But there will not change 
> peer->applied to 0. In this case, if tipc_mon_rcv is called again then 
> an information leak will happen.

I see, good analysis! Jon, Xue - is there a reason domain gets wiped
on memory allocation failure? I'd think we should leave the previous
pointer in place instead of freeing it first.

      reply	other threads:[~2022-06-30 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-28  8:31 [PATCH v2] net: tipc: fix possible infoleak in tipc_mon_rcv() Hangyu Hua
2022-06-28 10:28 ` Tung Quang Nguyen
2022-06-30  3:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-30  9:19   ` Hangyu Hua
2022-06-30 15:27     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220630082718.7df33430@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hbh25y@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au \
    --cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).