netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Cc: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: mark napi_id on sendmsg()
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 08:52:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220630085252.51e29049@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yr2Op9m1xt5gW7Pw@boxer>

On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:53:11 +0200 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > > Would it be possible to move the marking to when the queue is getting
> > > bound instead of the recv/send paths?   
> > 
> > I mean when socket is getting bound.  
> 
> So Bjorn said that it was the design choice to follow the standard
> sockets' approach. I'm including a dirty diff for a discussion which
> allows me to get napi_id at bind() time. But, this works for ice as this
> driver during the XDP prog/XSK pool load only disables the NAPI, so we are
> sure that napi_id stays the same. That might not be the case for other
> AF_XDP ZC enabled drivers though, they might delete the NAPI and this
> approach wouldn't work...or am I missing something?

Possible, but IDK if we're changing anything substantially in that
regard. The existing code already uses sk_mark_napi_id_once() so
if the NAPI ID changes during the lifetime of the socket the user
will be out of luck already. But no strong feelings.

> I'd prefer the diff below though as it simplifies the data path, but I
> can't say if it's safe to do so. We would have to be sure about drivers
> keeping their NAPI struct. This would also allow us to drop napi_id from
> xdp_rxq_info.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-30 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-29 10:57 [PATCH bpf] xsk: mark napi_id on sendmsg() Maciej Fijalkowski
2022-06-29 12:45 ` Björn Töpel
2022-06-29 12:53   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2022-06-29 13:18     ` Magnus Karlsson
2022-06-29 16:16     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-29 16:17       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-30 11:53         ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2022-06-30 15:52           ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-06-29 13:39   ` Björn Töpel
2022-06-29 14:28     ` Maciej Fijalkowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220630085252.51e29049@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).