netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
	Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 11/15] net/tls: Multi-threaded calls to TX tls_dev_del
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 19:37:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220706193735.49d5f081@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220706232421.41269-12-saeed@kernel.org>

On Wed,  6 Jul 2022 16:24:17 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> diff --git a/include/net/tls.h b/include/net/tls.h
> index 4fc16ca5f469..c4be74635502 100644
> --- a/include/net/tls.h
> +++ b/include/net/tls.h
> @@ -163,6 +163,11 @@ struct tls_record_info {
>  	skb_frag_t frags[MAX_SKB_FRAGS];
>  };
>  
> +struct destruct_work {
> +	struct work_struct work;
> +	struct tls_context *ctx;

Pretty strange to bundle the back-pointer with the work.
Why not put it directly in struct tls_offload_context_tx?

Also now that we have the backpointer, can we move the list member of
struct tls_context to the offload context? (I haven't checked if its
used in other places)

>  
>  	up_write(&device_offload_lock);
>  
> -	flush_work(&tls_device_gc_work);
> -
>  	return NOTIFY_DONE;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1435,6 +1416,5 @@ void __init tls_device_init(void)
>  void __exit tls_device_cleanup(void)
>  {
>  	unregister_netdevice_notifier(&tls_dev_notifier);
> -	flush_work(&tls_device_gc_work);
>  	clean_acked_data_flush();
>  }

Why don't we need the flush any more? The module reference is gone as
soon as destructor runs (i.e. on ULP cleanup), the work can still be
pending, no?

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-07  2:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-06 23:24 [pull request][net-next 00/15] mlx5 updates 2022-07-06 Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-06 23:24 ` [net-next 01/15] net/mlx5: Remove devl_unlock from mlx5_eswtich_mode_callback_enter Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-06 23:24 ` [net-next 02/15] net/mlx5: Use devl_ API for rate nodes destroy Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-06 23:24 ` [net-next 03/15] devlink: Remove unused function devlink_rate_nodes_destroy Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-06 23:24 ` [net-next 04/15] net/mlx5: Use devl_ API in mlx5_esw_offloads_devlink_port_register Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-06 23:24 ` [net-next 05/15] net/mlx5: Use devl_ API in mlx5_esw_devlink_sf_port_register Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-06 23:24 ` [net-next 06/15] devlink: Remove unused functions devlink_rate_leaf_create/destroy Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-06 23:24 ` [net-next 07/15] net/mlx5: Use devl_ API in mlx5e_devlink_port_register Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-06 23:24 ` [net-next 08/15] net/mlx5: Remove devl_unlock from mlx5_devlink_eswitch_mode_set Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-06 23:24 ` [net-next 09/15] devlink: Hold the instance lock in port_new / port_del callbacks Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-06 23:24 ` [net-next 10/15] net/tls: Perform immediate device ctx cleanup when possible Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-07  2:21   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-07  6:51     ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-07 16:14       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-07 17:29         ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-06 23:24 ` [net-next 11/15] net/tls: Multi-threaded calls to TX tls_dev_del Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-07  2:37   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-07-07 22:14     ` Tariq Toukan
2022-07-08  0:17       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-08 13:10         ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-07-08 18:10           ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-06 23:24 ` [net-next 12/15] net/mlx5e: kTLS, Introduce TLS-specific create TIS Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-06 23:24 ` [net-next 13/15] net/mlx5e: kTLS, Take stats out of OOO handler Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-06 23:24 ` [net-next 14/15] net/mlx5e: kTLS, Recycle objects of device-offloaded TLS TX connections Saeed Mahameed
2022-07-06 23:24 ` [net-next 15/15] net/mlx5e: kTLS, Dynamically re-size TX recycling pool Saeed Mahameed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220706193735.49d5f081@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=maximmi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeed@kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).