From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52827C433EF for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235333AbiGROZR (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2022 10:25:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52240 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231416AbiGROZQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2022 10:25:16 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45852CE13; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 07:25:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id b11so21506004eju.10; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 07:25:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7DdDsGhXcK90ynwzFc8Ey8lHFszMXZo5aRKhgEZd4uk=; b=OSVrgaaNfVM1U1imz3NejJXJRKz2xnHXN89Q1+rhR4nVNvKS6NKENr+a8Db+Q2mXH2 J+FoL4gCap1b57EoOBvhTiIkeeq7ZsujMYcqI/4/DRyNBnNzKWPWnA9CDqU2qnW4EsV6 nlDTskI7uy8IzD+jMRyUVWzkMH6kwmcfZQYW1t0v86bfCXCGgXn/GbHifkMcxAHXTwz1 K4AVARbCPWWWv1f+b1j3maj3KcGBHgMajQPOtsgGOCmhvQtN/0vFLdmoj9OlJCEgP/oO 315WJu8lb+uJleeExJzqKdNiGovqS7hN4Zj+etVfb+4v0yzMUKh3D08mAZLlx0wTQ1Cy zgMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7DdDsGhXcK90ynwzFc8Ey8lHFszMXZo5aRKhgEZd4uk=; b=EgENnTlflzXLjLnvMWQoSKHoEvWuoHCbNbzvXwvJLPee/lHmq2Jm/sfJN+dA+wyBxh hKeAXbKbzvwMdrEEkoZVfeYW87NaL5FO+xRPIEnIhwLZfP3v/Sx3nCqZgG2512B9RhUG gnbjaLvSCwqK3SxEEBjnraLRWTXQq9yFcAxC2d1ZvD9AksrR++jrvRGegwkVO+MLy1IV 0x9mXovFBrIQ/Ym06G5PO+MIZhJP/a/Pc14bxgD9Gg/H2GT6XezbUUXC74a47K7wJ9R/ Q39LZq9/5OqkIs4lCK0LWV0eBe6sX7vlZ/qIaFXArHy8p9kh3D+Ey45MWFi6vPPhf9H/ mb2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+s9JszCw9P31H8NSgPAYGhgFvPe2ZLz6jT4wZ+NVz7qUGgBMgT e4BdRhzqM6v7y9uOGMtTPmw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sEheIFNl3MBseKFin6lSWB6ACjtHJGFOFj4+AFpV+dz3UFgxQDHhyuosVn1sXr8b6XrmMijw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ef8b:b0:72b:58da:b115 with SMTP id ze11-20020a170906ef8b00b0072b58dab115mr24890310ejb.417.1658154309632; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 07:25:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.25.231.190]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u7-20020a056402110700b0043a6c9e50f4sm8606780edv.29.2022.07.18.07.25.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 18 Jul 2022 07:25:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 17:25:05 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Alexandre Belloni , Alvin =?utf-8?Q?=C5=A0ipraga?= , Andy Shevchenko , Claudiu Manoil , Daniel Scally , "David S. Miller" , DENG Qingfang , Eric Dumazet , Florian Fainelli , George McCollister , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Hauke Mehrtens , Heikki Krogerus , Kurt Kanzenbach , Landen Chao , Linus Walleij , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Marek =?utf-8?B?QmVow7pu?= , Matthias Brugger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Sakari Ailus , Sean Wang , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Vivien Didelot , Woojung Huh Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: dsa: always use phylink Message-ID: <20220718142505.3shv2rwe4fakgsp2@skbuf> References: <20220715171719.niqcrklpk4ittfvl@skbuf> <20220715160359.2e9dabfe@kernel.org> <20220716111551.64rjruz4q4g5uzee@skbuf> <20220716131345.b2jas3rucsifli7g@skbuf> <20220718124512.o3qxiwop7nzfjbfx@skbuf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 02:02:33PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > In the second RFC, I stated: > > "Some of the questions from the original RFC remain though, so I've > included that text below. I'm guessing as they remain unanswered that > no one has any opinions on them?" > > Clearly, I was soliciting answers from _everyone_ who received this, > not just the two people in the To: header. (...) > This is _not_ the issue I'm raising. I am complaining about the > "default_interface" issue that you've only piped up about, despite > (a) an explicit question having been asked about that approach, (b) it > appearing in not just one, not two, not three but four RFC series sent, > and only finally being raised when a non-RFC series was sent. > > This whole debarcle could have been avoided with providing feedback at > an earlier stage, when I explicitly requested it _several_ times. Please stop shoving quotes of your questions in my face, I'm still glad I deleted my draft responses to them when they were originally asked, because *when* (not *if*) things will have went sideways, I would have blamed myself for people wanting to test/respond but not having whom to talk to, because you rage quit. You need to understand that a voluntary reviewer doesn't have a duty to respond to you on any certain date, and that I'm not obliged to shut up about where to place "default_interface" because I haven't said anything about it in the first N series. I was on the fence whether it was even worth saying anything about it at all, and the only reason I decided to do it was because the patch to change every DSA driver's phylink_get_caps() prototype now conflicts with concurrent changes done to drivers, and doesn't apply to net-next anyway: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/E1oCNl3-006e3n-PT@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk/ So I really can't be reasonably accused of wanting to stall this series. You have no reason whatsoever to pick a fight with me, so please stop it.