netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	"Florian Westphal" <fw@strlen.de>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	"Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 13/13] selftests/bpf: Fix test_verifier failed test in unprivileged mode
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:24:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220719132430.19993-14-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220719132430.19993-1-memxor@gmail.com>

Loading the BTF won't be permitted without privileges, hence only test
for privileged mode by setting the prog type. This makes the
test_verifier show 0 failures when unprivileged BPF is enabled.

Fixes: 4118e9e9def ("selftest/bpf: Test for use-after-free bug fix in inline_bpf_loop")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c
index 2d0023659d88..a535d41dc20d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c
@@ -251,6 +251,7 @@
 	.expected_insns = { PSEUDO_CALL_INSN() },
 	.unexpected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
 	.func_info = { { 0, MAIN_TYPE }, { 16, CALLBACK_TYPE } },
 	.func_info_cnt = 2,
 	BTF_TYPES
-- 
2.34.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-19 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-19 13:24 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/13] New nf_conntrack kfuncs for insertion, changing timeout, status Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-19 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/13] bpf: Introduce BTF ID flags and 8-byte BTF set Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-19 18:37   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-20 18:42     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-19 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/13] tools/resolve_btfids: Add support for resolving kfunc flags Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-19 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/13] bpf: Switch to new kfunc flags infrastructure Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-19 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/13] bpf: Add support for forcing kfunc args to be trusted Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-19 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/13] bpf: Add documentation for kfuncs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-20 17:03   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-07-20 18:45     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-19 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/13] net: netfilter: Deduplicate code in bpf_{xdp,skb}_ct_lookup Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-19 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/13] net: netfilter: Add kfuncs to allocate and insert CT Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-19 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/13] net: netfilter: Add kfuncs to set and change CT timeout Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-19 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/13] net: netfilter: Add kfuncs to set and change CT status Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-19 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/13] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for trusted kfunc args Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-19 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for new nf_conntrack kfuncs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-19 13:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add negative " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-07-19 13:24 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220719132430.19993-14-memxor@gmail.com \
    --to=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).