netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, idosch@nvidia.com,
	petrm@nvidia.com, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	mlxsw@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, snelson@pensando.io
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v3 01/11] net: devlink: make sure that devlink_try_get() works with valid pointer during xarray iteration
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 23:22:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220720232258.22139059@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YtjpaRtkOwX00azI@nanopsycho>

On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 07:51:37 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >Hm. I always assumed we'd just use the xa_lock(). Unmarking the
> >instance as registered takes that lock which provides a natural 
> >barrier for others trying to take a reference.  
> 
> I guess that the xa_lock() scheme could work, as far as I see it. But
> what's wrong with the rcu scheme? I actually find it quite neat. No need
> to have another odd iteration helpers. We just benefit of xa_array rcu
> internals to make sure devlink pointer is valid at the time we make a
> reference. Very clear.

Nothing strongly against the RCU scheme, TBH. Just didn't expect it.
I can concoct some argument like it's one extra sync primitive we
haven't had to think about in devlink so far, but really if you prefer
RCU, I don't mind.

I do like the idea of wrapping the iteration into our own helper, tho.
Contains the implementation details of the iteration nicely. I didn't
look in sufficient detail but I would have even considered rolling the
namespace check into it for dump.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-21  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-20 15:12 [patch net-next v3 00/11] mlxsw: Implement dev info and dev flash for line cards Jiri Pirko
2022-07-20 15:12 ` [patch net-next v3 01/11] net: devlink: make sure that devlink_try_get() works with valid pointer during xarray iteration Jiri Pirko
2022-07-20 22:25   ` Keller, Jacob E
2022-07-21  5:45     ` Jiri Pirko
2022-07-21 18:55       ` Keller, Jacob E
2022-07-22  6:15         ` Jiri Pirko
2022-07-21  0:49   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-21  5:51     ` Jiri Pirko
2022-07-21  6:22       ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-07-21 12:04         ` Jiri Pirko
2022-07-22  6:15     ` Jiri Pirko
2022-07-22 15:50     ` Jiri Pirko
2022-07-22 18:23       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-23 15:41         ` Jiri Pirko
2022-07-25  8:17           ` Jiri Pirko
2022-07-20 15:12 ` [patch net-next v3 02/11] net: devlink: introduce nested devlink entity for line card Jiri Pirko
2022-07-20 15:12 ` [patch net-next v3 03/11] mlxsw: core_linecards: Introduce per line card auxiliary device Jiri Pirko
2022-07-21  8:04   ` Ido Schimmel
2022-07-20 15:12 ` [patch net-next v3 04/11] mlxsw: core_linecards: Expose HW revision and INI version Jiri Pirko
2022-07-21  8:05   ` Ido Schimmel
2022-07-20 15:12 ` [patch net-next v3 05/11] mlxsw: reg: Extend MDDQ by device_info Jiri Pirko
2022-07-20 15:12 ` [patch net-next v3 06/11] mlxsw: core_linecards: Probe provisioned line cards for devices and expose FW version Jiri Pirko
2022-07-21  8:11   ` Ido Schimmel
2022-07-21 16:01     ` Jiri Pirko
2022-07-20 15:12 ` [patch net-next v3 07/11] mlxsw: reg: Add Management DownStream Device Tunneling Register Jiri Pirko
2022-07-20 15:12 ` [patch net-next v3 08/11] mlxsw: core_linecards: Expose device PSID over device info Jiri Pirko
2022-07-21  8:13   ` Ido Schimmel
2022-07-20 15:12 ` [patch net-next v3 09/11] mlxsw: core_linecards: Implement line card device flashing Jiri Pirko
2022-07-21  8:25   ` Ido Schimmel
2022-07-21 16:01     ` Jiri Pirko
2022-07-20 15:12 ` [patch net-next v3 10/11] selftests: mlxsw: Check line card info on provisioned line card Jiri Pirko
2022-07-20 15:12 ` [patch net-next v3 11/11] selftests: mlxsw: Check line card info on activated " Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220720232258.22139059@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=mlxsw@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=snelson@pensando.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).