netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 08/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock while calling ip_mr_forward()
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 00:15:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220722211530.ywhc6pao4s6rx2ad@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220722211005.p2pfvy4qwdvolxi3@skbuf>

On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 12:10:05AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> I just noticed that we appear to have the same problem with the
> equivalent call path for ipv6: ip6mr_mfc_add -> ip6mr_cache_resolve ->
> ip6_mr_forward, although I don't have smcroute or the kernel configured
> for any IPv6 multicast routes right now, so I can't say for sure.

Not to mention ip6_mr_forward() has a random rcu_read_unlock() thrown in
there, with no paired lock(), left from who knows what refactoring...
I don't think I'll be able to report all the locking problems with the
IP multicast routing code, maybe someone with more familiarity should
take a look there :-/

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-22 21:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-23  4:34 [PATCH v2 net-next 00/19] ipmr: get rid of rwlocks Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 01/19] ip6mr: do not get a device reference in pim6_rcv() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 02/19] ipmr: add rcu protection over (struct vif_device)->dev Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 03/19] ipmr: change igmpmsg_netlink_event() prototype Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 04/19] ipmr: ipmr_cache_report() changes Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 05/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock in __pim_rcv() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 06/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock in ioctl(SIOCGETVIFCNT) Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 07/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock before calling ipmr_cache_unresolved() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 08/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock while calling ip_mr_forward() Eric Dumazet
2022-07-22 19:34   ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-22 20:37     ` Eric Dumazet
2022-07-22 21:10       ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-22 21:15         ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 09/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock in ipmr_get_route() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 10/19] ip6mr: ip6mr_cache_report() changes Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 11/19] ip6mr: do not acquire mrt_lock in pim6_rcv() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 12/19] ip6mr: do not acquire mrt_lock in ioctl(SIOCGETMIFCNT_IN6) Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 13/19] ip6mr: do not acquire mrt_lock before calling ip6mr_cache_unresolved Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 14/19] ip6mr: do not acquire mrt_lock while calling ip6_mr_forward() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 15/19] ip6mr: switch ip6mr_get_route() to rcu_read_lock() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 16/19] ipmr: adopt rcu_read_lock() in mr_dump() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 17/19] ipmr: convert /proc handlers to rcu_read_lock() Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 18/19] ipmr: convert mrt_lock to a spinlock Eric Dumazet
2022-06-23  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 19/19] ip6mr: " Eric Dumazet
2022-06-24 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 00/19] ipmr: get rid of rwlocks patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220722211530.ywhc6pao4s6rx2ad@skbuf \
    --to=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).